Lizard sex.

[email protected] fwiw

https://headscale.net/stable/

Green/White Ranger!!

Go Go Power Rangers!

I appreciate the honesty. It’s been exhausting watching people twist themselves in knots trying to justify these events otherwise. I think it’s a boon to those that oppose it.

That is a screenshot of the linked page.

That is a screenshot of the linked page.

Their linked guide is a great summary. The archive.org link above is partially a workbook to help people figure out where to start with these things too with considering personal abilities and needs… There are so many options!! [email protected] too, is a form of praxis through the building of public knowledge, skills and to help inform policy. No matter what happens, there’s always something to do.

We all need each other. ❤️

Get involved and build resilience in your local community. It’s super beneficial for your mental health, social health and you can do something tangible that does make a difference. This resilience will help build and maintain and more importantly sustain the structural and social support for things like general strikes. It’s quite literally grounding in practice and people always need to eat. It’s a place to meet people that also care.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240105073255/https://effectiveactivist.com/zine/

It is only in the oppressor’s benefit to do otherwise. Remember these are the same people causing both issues.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/11/inactivists-tangling-up-the-climate-crisis-in-culture-wars-manston-airport-kent

Edit: Also check out [email protected] for inspiration. :)

Gen Z brainrot. Proud of them.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9315181/

Abstract:

As anthropogenic climate change threatens human existence on Earth, historians have begun to explore the scientific antecedents of environmental Malthusianism, the idea that human population growth is a major driver of ecosystem degradation and that environmental protection requires a reduction in human numbers. These accounts, however, neglect the antagonistic relationship between environmental Malthusianism and demography, thereby creating an illusion of scientific consensus. This article details the entwined histories of environmental Malthusianism and demography, revealing points of disagreement – initially over methods of analyzing and predicting population growth and later over the role of population growth in ecosystem degradation – and moments of strategic collaboration that benefited both groups of scientists. It contends that the image of scientific consensus in existing histories has lent support to ongoing calls for population control, detracting attention from more proximate causes of environmental devastation, such as polluting modes of production, extractive business practices and government subsidies for fossil fuel development.

Abridged conclusion:

Since the end of World War II, environmental Malthusians have pointed to ecosystem degradation as supposedly obvious evidence that the Earth is already overpopulated and have called for population control as an alternative to environmental regulation and economic redistribution. Despite their scientific opposition, demographers collaborated with environmental Malthusians just long enough in the 1950s and 1960s to create a global population movement that advanced the agendas of both groups. The harms caused by that movement – both by governments that explicitly limited childbearing, such as China, and by supposedly voluntary programs that nonetheless imposed contraception where it was not desired – have been well documented (Connelly, 2008; Greenhalgh, 2008; Hartmann, 1995). However, even the most critical histories of the population control movement largely fail to recognize the illusory nature of the scientific consensus that claimed to undergird it.

Correct, but widely used by those on the Fediverse. Just like how there’s a spot on your profile for your Matrix handle on here.

Matrix is federated via bridges. It’s a sister protocol.

https://github.com/microsoft/inshellisense if you have to stay with Bash :)

step 1: sudo apt install sl

step 2: fuck up

step 3: ???

step 4: profit!!!

Yeah, about that…

Religion is a tool and was one of the first forms of government, a proto-government. States are also a tool, do the same shit (resource control) and now that god is capital. Many modern religious folks do more mutual aid in their community than the average terminally online leftist and I don’t blanket blame others for seeking meaning when lives are complicated and messy. People need social safety nets and now churches are fallbacks when states fail in different areas. Be kind to individuals and ruthless to systems. States are just continuing where the schism with religion left off. Religious institutions managed surplus extraction, states took over that function (often incorporating religious legitimation), and now capital operates as the organising logic with its own quasi-sacred justifications. New Atheist attitudes often miss the forest for the trees and function as a reactionary sentiment not grounded in materialism. It treats religion as a causal prime mover rather than as an institution shaped by and serving material interests. I have book reccomendations if you are interested in this. Note, Christianity is really interesting case sudy, but that is a whole seperate conversation.

I’m tired, chat.