you two put more thought into this conversation than i did that image lol.

right lol.

not really an issue. DPI just increases costs for enforcement and is fairly easily worked around at the application layer. annoying to implement a workaround but not hard. this is the issue with most enforcement mechanisms people try to come up with when dealing with systems, they try to prevent anything they dont like ™ and it just ends up costing them more.

in fact iirc i2p basically helps with this problem just by existing already since it inherently generates a steady stream of data.

They block the ip addresses for the server components of those applications. easily circumvented with a proxy outside of russia. most these communication apps have such proxy support builtin.

The only way ‘apps’ can be banned is if they cut of the internet. soon as you have a data pipe from one end to another you can encrypt whatever you send.

This is why i2p and p2p protocols are so important it makes it infinitely harder to control / ban. you end up having to have a directional whitelist (i.e. you need to only allow outgoing connections from home devices to a specific set of ip), and even then once thats in place… if any of those things allow communication we can push data through them.

Its not even remotely interesting of a read.

It says basically nothing of value beyond the patently obvious that is included in year 1 algorithms courses on queueing systems.

Durable queues have always been preferable for anyone who cares about reliability if it took 15 years for this person to realize this fact. Shrug

I use this guy

They enshrined the 2nd amendment for a reason. but for now its enough to do simple things like:

• boycott / disrupt any local companies that aid and abed ICE/national guard/armed forces. grocery stores/hotels/restaurants. etc.
• disrupt these peoples ability to sleep.
• repeat the above for any federal agents in your state who are carrying out trumps agenda.

smile disagree! wikipedia cites academic journals for the majority ‘yes’ case, which is an entirely different beast. the new articles were firmly in the no category since you get to lump the ‘undetermined’ into the no group. But I dont particularly care one way or another beyond amusement. =)

strictly speaking? adage is more tailored towards unverified wisdom. axiom is more mathematically stringent. i was being fairly loose with my terminology. adage would be the more proper term here.

there is an axiom for news titles that ask a question. ‘Any new title that asks a question the answer is always ‘no’’

Tired trope that has been disproven repeatedly. What you’re missing is that the left voters are what drives the energy to get all the nonvoters to the booth.

Without that energy the dems lose.

you know what jimmy, you’ve inspired me with your persistent ignorance. I’ve touched up a famous story for you.

I am Kam Kam I am

That Kam-I-am That Kam-I-am! I do not like that Kam-I-am.

Do you like liberal genocides?

I do not like it, Kam-I-am. I do not like liberal genocides.

Would you like them Here or there?

I would not like them here or there. I would not like them anywhere. I do not like liberal genocides. I do not like it, Kam-I-am.

Would you like them in a house? Would you like them with a howitzer?

I do not like them in a house. I do not like them with a howitzer. I do not like them here or there. I do not like them anywhere. I do not like liberal genocides. I do not like them, Kam-I-am.

Would you vote for them in a box? Would you vote for them with a fox?

Not in a box. Not with a fox. Not in a house. Not with a howizer. I would not like them here or there. I would not like them anywhere. I would not like liberal genocides. I do not like it, Kam-I-am.

Would you? Could you? in a tank? Try it! Try it! Here they are.

I would not, could not, in a tank.

You may like them. You will see. You may like them in a tree? Not in a tree. I would not, could not in a tree. Not in a tank! You let me be.

I do not like them in a box. I do not like them with a fox. I do not like them in a house. I do not like them with a howitzer. I do not like them here or there. I do not like them anywhere. I do not like liberal genocides. I do not like them, Kam-I-am.

A plane! A plane! A plane! A plane! Could you, would you on a plane?

Not on a plane! Not in a tree! Not in a tank! Kam! Let me be! I would not, could not, in a box. I could not, would not, with a fox. I will not vote for them with a howitzer I will not vote for them in a house. I will not vote for them here or there. I will not vote for them anywhere. I do not like it, Kam-I-am.

Say! In the dark? Here in the dark! Would you, could you, in the dark?

I would not, could not, in the dark.

Would you, could you, in the rain?

I would not, could not, in the rain. Not in the dark. Not on a train, Not in a tank, Not in a tree. I do not like it, Kam, you see. Not in a house. Not in a box. Not with a howitzer. Not with a fox. I will not like them here or there. I do not like them anywhere!

You do not like liberal genocides?

I do not like it, Kam-I-am.

Could you, would you, with a jew?

I would not, could not, with a jew!

Would you, could you, on a elephant?

I could not, would not, on a elephant. I could not, would not, with a jew. I will not like them in the rain. I will not like them on a train. Not in the dark! Not in a tree! Not in a tank! You let me be!

I do not like them in a box. I do not like them with a fox. I will not like them in a house. I do not like them with a howitzer. I do not like them here or there. I do not like them ANYWHERE!

I do not like liberal genocides!

I do not like it, Kam-I-am.

You do not like it. SO you say. Try it! Try it! And you may. Try them and you may I say.

Kam! I will not try it. When you visit Palestine, maybe you’ll feel. When you lose to fascists, maybe you’ll see.

Just how much of a cunt you truly be. Now go away and let me be, your liberal genocides are not for me.

Then feel free to leave. Its hilarious how you beg for our votes while insulting us. Fuck off or give us what we want. Either way. Makes no matter to us.

Its pretty clear you didnt learn your lesson during the last cycle when you were shilling for a certain genocidal dem candidate.

Yes, your point is you think leftists dont vote. We get it.

Our point is leftists dont vote when the candidate is trash. The votes are there the candidates are not.

There isnt anything special about NYC beyond having a high population density that makes it hard for the fascist trash to gain power there.

Tell that to cuomo

There is, retrovibe Minus the whole ‘released’ part but they’ll come around eventually

It doesn’t fit most peoples usecases. Its why they’re only used by techies. I perfectly understand the utility they provide. Im simply rejecting the premise that such utility needs to be anywhere near as complicated as those systems are to setup

Im not the one butt hurt over someone critiquing some software. ;) simply pointing out the deployment complexity vastly out weighs the benefits. Its why the ecosystem has stagnated with only technies.

hehe they’re clearly products of their times/ecosystems. I dont judge people for using them. I just shake my head at what people are willing to tolerate when there are far easier mechanisms to find and download. I havent had to go outside of a single tracker atm for my uses so that might be part of it.

sorry bud but those tools just are not that useful. you’re free to disagree of course but there are better torrenting automation tools out there. im of course biased but shrug