I call it Starducks

That’s when they become the Outerprise.

Superbowl has some excellent posts, and I’m like not even an owl guy (whatever that means.)

If people search for illegal content does that get you in trouble?

Was wondering why they were using a 12 year old live CD. Then I realized the post itself was 12 years old.

I like my Live CDs like I like my scotch.

Wait it’s the right that’s pissed? I was thinking it would be the left that’s pissed because they would consider this exploitation and astroturfing. Hmm, go figure. (I wasn’t going to read the article.) Maybe Facebook can piss everyone off with this really dumb idea.

Also are you really “de-googling” if you’re just using a different frontend?

Maybe some can strip out the ads or something but I’d guess that’s always a cat and mouse game.

lol Reddit mods

Why are they putting dead birds in the freezer?

Yeah that’s the joke.

Link from Zelda?

Oh they’re targeted There’s even a term for it. It’s called whaling.

About punishment though, do companies normally “punish” people for being victims of a cyberattack? I could see them maybe make you take some cyber security training.

If they fired you, I wonder if the company would worry you might sue them for wrongful termination, claiming it wasn’t your fault.

Of course if they give you the security training and you still click the bad link, maybe they can use that as a justification for termination, where they will claim you were properly trained to avoid it.

Unfortunately for the fediverse, most regular users want to use their twitters and facebooks and instagrams and whatnot. I don’t see regular users switching over. And if they did, you know the big guys would come up with something to compete.

There was also a plane crash recently which I think is unrelated to the martial law thing.

Part of me thinks this could actually be a real thing.

Oh do tell how we helped create this war. I can’t wait to hear this bullshit.

EDIT tick tock MFer… taps watch

And let’s pretend for a second they can decrypt these packets. (Like let’s pretend they work with the CIA/NSA, who let’s say has some special key…) Even then, how are they going to determine that the sender and receiver do not have legit rights to own and/or transmit those bits? It’s fucking nuts.

“To place a direct order on the router”?? wtf does that even mean?

Seven words in… looks back to check TLD… yup.

They can work, but they can’t out. That’s their problem.