No, but they want to seem cool

And they’ll use Grok to write the code anyway 😂

Or Rust

Rewrite it in Rust has gone too far 😆

Phew, it’s not an AI abomination.

Instant buy

Literal pennies though, just the requisite tithe to keep King Donald off his ass.

Maybe Nintendo, Sony and MS will be next?

I want a 3rd party store on all my consoles, why can’t I?

Apple has a literal 100 billion in cash reserves. They’ll be just fine with losing a billion a year while becoming THE source for premium TV content

Apple is producing original content that they own, it’s not going anywhere and will produce “value” for them in perpetuity.

And if they’re cash strapped they can sell the license for, say, Ted Lasso to Netflix.

We’ll burn that bridge when we get to it. Let’s handle the people owning a thousand homes first. Then move on the ones who own a dozen or less.

Fight a class war, not a culture war.

And you, who thinks you are in the “upper class” by making 500k a year. You’re not, you are among the poor.

We fight the people who own billions, not you.

I don’t want to “just” drag and drop anything, it’s 2025.

I want to have a service that keeps track of what books I have read/listened and what’s my location in them.

Then I can plug into that service on multiple different devices and the state is automatically shared between them. I can pick up any computer with a browser and keep listening where I left the book on my phone.

deleted by creator

You can buy audiobooks outside of Audible: https://soundbooththeater.com/series/dungeon-crawler-carl/

I want a local LLM filtering my feed(s). So I really don’t need to see Elmo and Donald -related stuff.

Simple word filters don’t work, but with a LLM I might be able to make it work

Not really a soul, more like an explanation why the bob clones are different and why they can’t just make 1:1 clones of an each other - even when their consciousness moves from one place to another.

They just called it a “soul” in lack of a better name.

And you’ll again inconvenience a human slightly as they look at a pixelated copy of a picture of a cat or some noise.

No cops are called, no accounts closed

Nope.

A human checker would get a reduced quality copy after multiple CSAM matches. No police was to be called if the human checker didn’t verify a positive match

Your idea of flooding someone with fake matches that are actually cat pics wouldn’t have worked

They were not “suspected” they had to be matches to actual CSAM.

And after that a reduced quality copy was shown to an actual human, not an AI like in Googles case.

So the false positive would slightly inconvenience a human checker for 15 seconds, not get you Swatted or your account closed

This is EXACTLY what Apple tried to do with their on-device CSAM detection, it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy and still it got shouted down

I’m interested in seeing what happens when Holy Google, for which most nerds have a blind spot, does the exact same thing

EDIT: from looking at the downvotes, it really seems that Google can do no wrong 😆 And Apple is always the bad guy in lemmy

Twitter API costs $$$ to use