• 0 Posts
  • 492 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Everywhere does, but Canada has a post secondary education rate of ~66%, and typically votes 66% sane. America has a post secondary education rate of ~50%, and typically votes 50% sane.

    There are other differences between the countries, but I think it’s impossible to argue that a substantially more educated population hasn’t led to a stabler and more thoughtful political climate.

    How many revolutions around the world have been sparked by student protests? It honestly seems like close to half of them from the past century or two. There’s a reason that Elon and all the billionaires are trying to convince people that college is a waste.


  • You are right, all the comments replying to you are making vacuous individualist arguments like ‘it won’t work every single time’, when what’s important is that ‘on average, it will raise intelligence and the ability to critically evaluate situations’.

    The internet loves to just regurgitate what they heard before and only deal in absolutes, so right now it’s that they would have made more money in the trades, so suddenly college and higher education is meaningless and provided no value to them. It’s honestly embarassing how much they’re just buying into right wing propaganda.

    A more educated population is a more empowered population, and there’s absolutely no reason that everyone shouldn’t do some form of post secondary education, whether it’s university, college, or a trades program that includes college level courses. You’re not going to be able to understand how the world actually works or get a sense of the depth of knowledge in each field by just dropping out of high school and stopping thinking hard.




  • They are still a waste of resources compared to a purely collective solution like you’re advocating for.

    The most efficient use of resources would be to build massive solar farms in warm sunny areas like Arizona, and then build massive distribution grids to where it’s needed. But this sacrifices resiliency and flexibility.

    It’s no different then diesel generators. The reality is that the world is not simple and the best option will be a mixed system that is collectivist in some areas and individualistic in others.

    When you live in a city and the ambulance station is 5m from your house, then owning a car will, at most, save you 5m in an emergency situation. When you live in the country and it’s 45m from your house, then owning a car can save you 45min which can easily be the difference between life and death, or recovering normally vs recovering with life altering injuries.











  • Lmao, no.

    It’s because roads get built first because they’re cheap and flexible. It costs nothing to build a dirt road but a bulldozer and a bit of time.

    Transportation networks start with desire paths with take the form of cheap and easy roads, then they’re expanded and improved upon or abandoned as time goes on demand calls for it.

    Eventually public transit gets added and then eventually trains get built.

    Congratulations on being a semi-outdoor cat, how often do you go out to the country, vs how often do you walk around the block before returning to your echo chamber? Because bringing up a detached Who Framed Roger Rabbit argument about San Francisco’s trams has literally nothing to do with most of the rural country that simply does not and never has had the demand necessary to support public transit.