Maybe because there are still people who are not tired of Call of Duty, liked the predecessor and are still looking forward for a sequel and play it with their friends?

Oh wait, this isn’t even the newest CoD? Probably they just forgot to update the prices. Probably forgot it even exists because there is a new one.

Are you telling me, instead of new games I’ll never play, I should buy old games I’ll never play?

Considering how much your average Switch user plays online games, it might be even less justified for Nintendo to require a subscription than Sony or Microsoft. I really don’t feel like paying for that, just because I want to play MM2 every couple of months.

That sounds interesting, never heard oft it. Thanks.

deleted by creator

I really don’t play enough on the Switch to justify subscribing to Nintendo Online (also: fuck you Nintendo that this is even a thing), but do I miss playing MM2. Such a great game, but literally unplayable without the subscription.

I’m pretty sure the Switch 1 is older than 4 years (and was cheaper than $500). And their games are actually quite good.

So Nintendo might be a fuckwad company, but your comment is still full of bullshit.

Of course it is. If you want to buy a handheld now you want to know which one has more power, no matter when it was released.

But the problem isn’t that the mod is based on BG3. It’s a mod for Stardew Valley. It just uses characters from BG3.

Making the mod for a FOSS game instead wouldn’t change anything. The only solution would be making a Tux-mod for Stardew Valley instead. And who tf wants to play that?

Knowledge is king in this game. How should I have known that all my teamwork feats are useless, when I pick Azata Mythic Path? That’s why I play on daring with respec enabled.

2D: Super Mario World. It just plays smooth af. Pretty close to a perfect videogame.

3D: Rayman 2. Platformers usually have a colorful and happy world. Rayman might still be colorful, but it stands out because it’s kinda grim. Gameplay wise… I should replay it, because I’m not actually sure anymore. I think all 3D platformers of this time could be a little bit janky. I remember there were some frustrating parts, at least for a kid.

I need an bigger living room

That’s not very patientgamers-like

Wrath of the Rightous. I’ll be back in a couple of months, cya

I think Gold was amazing back when I first played. I liked the new Pokemon designs and when I found out you can go to Kanto, my mind was blown. I did not expect so much playtime after the Elite 4. Everything in that game was an improvement to the first gen. It still had some jank, but at that time, I think it was the perfect game they could make.

But there is one thing where I think the GBA games stood out: graphics. I still love it, it’s extremely timeless and just beautiful. That is still how Pokemon games should look like today. I prefer Leaf Green over Emerald because it doesn’t have way too many water routes like Hoenn and as Gold and Silver, it had some nice unexpected post Elite 4 content.

Of course I’m totally biased because those were my childhood games. I tried Soul Silver maaaaany years later and got Shield for the switch, but they could not keep up with the GBA games. Maybe I will give Gen 4 and 5 a go in the future though.

Hey, are you me?

Mario and Zelda are the obvious answer, but Golf Story would be my answer as well. It’s sad that the sequel sucks (never tried it) and that the series never made it to other platforms.

A little late, aren’t you?

The Dreamcast didn’t even survive until the release of the Xbox (if I’m not mistaken).

I agree, the comment before you was just trying to be mean and funny