That’s not really true though… They come up with brand new sentences all the time.

Why is this so funny? It’s fucking stupid 😂

True to some extent, and I do this, but some aspects are unavoidable. For example the GTK save/open dialogue is used by Firefox, and it sucks (why can’t I type the fucking path in?). There aren’t good and popular alternative browsers that use Qt or any other toolkit with a decent dialogue.

Thus is a good distinction to make.

But it didn’t seem obvious to me that OP is making the second choice? Never mind, I see the comments now

Thank you!

Yeah, maybe you’re right. I don’t known where the threshold is.

I wonder if the current computational feasibility will cap out improvment of current generation LLMs soon?

emergent behavior doesn’t really exist in certain model archetypes

Hey, would you have a reference for this? I’d love to read it. Does it apply to deep neural nets? And/or recurrent NNs?

Doesn’t that just say that AI will never be cheap? You can still brute force it, which is more or less how back propagation works.

I don’t think “intelligence” needs to have a perfect “solution”, it just needs to do things well enough to be useful. Which is how human intelligence developed, evolutionarily - it’s absolutely not optimal.