https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR_RAp73ra0

And here are some videos categorizing more of her grifts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70vYj1KPyT4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJjPH3TQif0

And more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oipI5TQ54tA

She has also peddled transphobic talking points

we have gone so far down the meta-irony abyss there is no turning back.

I was like “what’s a popo” for a hot minute.

Leaving aside the questions whether it would benefit us, what makes you think LLM won’t bring about technical singularity? Because, you know, the word LLM doesn’t mean that much… It just means it’s a model, that is “large” (currently taken to mean many parameters), and is capable of processing languages.

Don’t you think whatever that will bring about the singularity, will at the very least understand human languages?

So can you clarify, what is it that you think won’t become AGI? Is it transformer? Is it any models that trained in the way we train llms today?

Well, you described pretty well what llms were trained to do. But from there you can’t derive how they are doing it. Maybe they don’t have real knowledge, or maybe they do. Right now literally no one can definitively claim one way or the other, not even top of the field ML researchers. (They may have opinions though)

I think it’s perfectly justified to hate AI, but it’s better to have a less biased view of what it is.

lol no? we say “i am sad”, not “i am sadness”. that’d be weird.

If a number is long enough human won’t be able to perceive it all at once, so in fact there are only finite number of cases we need to check.

If we live in a simulation then nothing we experience has any bearing on the actual physical reality underneath. Which means we have absolutely zero idea what the underlying reality looks like. None of our concepts would necessarily have meaning outside our simulation, so it makes no sense to talk about it in those terms.

Duopolies are very prevalent in tech, think AMD/Intel, AMD/nvidia, Windows/MacOS, iOS/Android, etc.

As to why? idk. Big companies buy up small ones until one left so they don’t get sued for being a monopoly? Maybe, but I don’t think that applies to all those cases.

And it’s kinda funny to see it breaks so many people’s brain.

Is it really so complicated to support them suing UK over OSA, without supporting the sites themselves?

That’s not it. You are just describing determinism, not superdeterminism. Superdeterminism says not only are the observations performed by you and your partner determined, but they are also determined in such a way to make quantum entanglement looks real. i.e. there’s no quantum entanglement, the particles are independent, but the universe conspires to make you measure in such a way that your results appear correlated.

And if you generalize measurement to mean any interaction you have with the world, you get what I described earlier.

Superdeterminism to me is the worst. It basically means the Universe looks the way it does because it just is. Like it’s not because particles move, interact, based on a set of fundamental laws and that ultimately gives rise to the universe we see. No, superdeterminism means there’s no rules, the universe is just made like this. Every particle is meticulously put into place to make it look as if there are physical laws, like a grand conspiracy.

It’s kinda like last-Tuesdayism.

Just ask Tom to reboot it again.

I am not paying for this :)

you shouldn’t either

Not an iceberg, this is just the Linux to schizo pipeline.

what aboutalias ma=man ? Same meaning and shorter.

let’s fucking go!!

We had a trust based system for so long. No one is forced to honor robots.txt, but most big players did. Almost restores my faith in humanity a little bit. And then AI companies came and destroyed everything. This is why we can’t have nice things.

Name of the song? Thank you. 🙏