

a pet doesn’t leave behind an estate to inherit. laws are hesitant on human euthanasia because of the scope of misuse by greedy beneficiaries of wills.
a pet doesn’t leave behind an estate to inherit. laws are hesitant on human euthanasia because of the scope of misuse by greedy beneficiaries of wills.
i seem to have misunderstood. my reading was that they were tracking when selfies were being deleted from the user’s device itself (and not off the facebook platform).
if the article is about selfies being deleted from the user’s posts on meta platforms, otoh, i don’t understand why there’s a privacy brouhaha. surely their tos and privacy policy covers using your data and actions on their platforms for targeted advertising?
there is a conversation that needs to be had there about the morality of such a move, sure, but i don’t see a privacy violation.
if i had a cosmetic company, i would question the efficacy of this method. that’s not how i would like to allocate my targeted advertising budget.
what if they deleted the pics because they were just changing phones? what if it was because they ran out of space? what if they were degoogling? what if it was because they’re transforming?
there are other–more likely–scenarios why a person deletes their selfies than them reaching a nadir of self-loathing. i don’t see this move converting into buying actions.
how did you get the metal rods in the wheels so straight?
maybe you spoke too fast?
“let’s uproot all these trees and invade this space. and when the roots of the few remaining trees do what they are supposed to do, let’s blame them for ‘ruining’ human infrastructure!”
this is the AI model that truly passes the Turing Test.
and how high did OP have to count before he touched somebody else’s lips the first time?
screw googling. try saying it yourself without touching lips.
it comes out as “oen”.
And giving more tax breaks to companies that stay and sell in the US?
that’s technically what tariffs do. topologically, it’s the same thing: using policy to give a price advantage to domestic producers.
talk about shopping locally and so forth.
talk gets one only so far. when those numbers start to chomp into the household budget, everyone forsakes the “made in…” label in favour of the price tag.
they weren’t feeling lucky?
not saying that you’re wrong, but the order of your words seem to imply that the hobbit followed lotr.
it actually was released seventeen years (and a whole second world war and more) earlier.
it was released even before we voluntarily chose to irradiate our atmosphere like dumbfucks. the hobbit came out in 1937, lotr came out in 1954.
awesome! so there is scope to literally piss all over AI! where does one sign up?
why can’t they use piss, instead, though?
However, as Keighin did not show up to court,
bro quite literally played the “sorry mario, the princess in another castle” card at them.
perhaps it’s the limit imof each data type?!
gemini harvests only your first four cobtacts, your last two locations, and so on.
how does one defeat that? have fewer than four friends and don’t go out!
why does a site that shows a static image need me to enable javascript to view it?
the human *ears. we need both ears working together to determine the source of a sound.
teamwork makes the dream work, people.
Also, what three
two for sure: video games and forgetting to look for discounts.
the third one–which is more of i don’t know precisely what it says rather than it getting a hard pass–is the “buying … (clot)hes” which is mostly hidden behind the right edge of the big fat “capitalism” sign.
is this not just affirming the premise of the sixth book? that’s the whole reason why Potter found the Prince’s spells so fascinating. school subjects are not meant to entertain. they are meant to teach.
also, as book five attests–as well as does the subject of history of magic–some syllabi and some subjects were way more boring than others.
my main gripe would be that nobody taught english or any other form of formal communication at hogwarts. i dunno how they all just didn’t end up speaking like Hagrid.
how many judge judy cases are about problems caused by runaway children? there’s a reason why laws mandate leashes for dogs – their scope for damage is far higher than is that for toddlers.