• 2 Posts
  • 82 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle


  • Hey, RIM/Blackberry’s CEO went to mobile world Congress in 2010, 3 solid YEARS after the iPhone launched, was dominating and defining the smartphone world and said, “we feel touchscreen is not the future of mobile phones” and rolled out another hybrid touch/keyboard model like the 5 they already had

    Blackberry was $150/share as of 2009 with the entire world in front of it. It’s now worth $3.59/share.




  • Yeah, that at least can be systematically identified and corrected; the bias and also inaccuracy of judgement of current human officers seems far worse and when combined with the fact non-vehicular safety is seen as a low priority or completely ignored, getting to “good” for safety of non-vehicular traffic is life and death. A few tickets that get waived, or in my city, Portland Oregon, a citizen sued to prove the cameras inaccurate where they were and won vs. engineers, is a small price to pay vs. the current state of zero enforcement and bodies littering crosswalks and cyclists mown down in “bike lanes”.







  • It’s the principle that short-term shareholders have priority above all else–which is a fallacy–that drives these behaviors, start-ups have also always been dependent on VC who require more onerous terms and the growth of tech has almost blended these two as to be inseparable this point.

    Companies are required to act in the best interest of shareholders legally–but this does not define they must enshittify their product or service no matter what in the short term as it destroys in in the long run, from Boeing to Google. There is a clear case waiting a public company willing to be brave enough to fight it, that the long-term interest of shareholders should be equally(it not more heavily) weighted in decision-making. It would remove so much awfulness that companies approach the world with–from not caring about compliance, safety, quality,etc.



  • To protect his followers from the capitalists, surely…

    It clearly should not be allowed for private ownership of the means of truth creation; education, news media, etc. but the alternative is either state control, or praying that a true grassroots, democratic and consistent news media takes firm and permanent it will not only start but continue. Small wonder the latter hasny had many chances to be experimented with since the chaos out of what is almost always a revolution means when power is taken or “order restored” it again is either capitalists with means to produce news media or the state.

    In 2025, costs of production are effectively zero, so it could be done, but now the monster of misinformation–which also has costs of production of zero–is a well oiled and established.

    Where do you go from here?