I actually agree with @[email protected] 's approach

I’ve actually previously asked users to edit their posts in the communities that I mod and it’s working pretty well.

To me, asking people to do something first makes more sense as most users are reasonable considerate people.
Plus it just seems like the more polite method of doing things as an admin

Thanks for sharing!👌

It took me a bit to start but this article was an incredible read and I appreciate the quantity and quality of insight the article provided into the inner workings of the censorship machine🤔🤗

oh wait I think I misunderstood when I made my other comment.

Sorry about that! Although I’m having some difficulty in interpreting your points.🤔

I don’t know if kid saving lunch money to build a computer is a viable route anymore

for sure. It’s gonna suck ass for a lot of Americans.

For the rest of your comment I’m gonna add that the tariff situation benefits retailers the most while manufactures and OEMs are taking the brunt of the tariff financial damage and ultimately the tariffs are then passed onto the customers unfortunately.

Some companies might implode or move out of the US it looks like.

Not sure if this fits here as while the tariffs situation are primarily causing chaos and price inflations in the US, the redirection of goods might also cause companies to increase costs globally in order to cover the cash flow burdens and payments caused by real time tariff fluctations.

Uninformed buyers will buy the 8GB card get a poor experience and will be forced to buy a new card sooner than later.

It really does seem like Nvidia is intentionally trying to confuse their own customers for some reason.

for money/extreme greed

While I haven’t dove too deep into the code I didn’t see any copyright files or entries in the original so it seems like you’re good as far as I can tell👍

Edit:
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

Sometimes it do like that

I see that this is a fork of a prior project licensed under MPL-2.0

So can you provide proof that you have received proper permission from the original developer to relicense under the MIT license?

Previous discussion threads about EU OS:

• Can this become the European Union’s own Linux Distribution?
• What even is “EU OS”?

I won an ipad air once and immediately sold it on kijiji cause I don’t use apple’s proprietary ewaste

I used the money to repair my bike :D

It looke like NVIDIA’s now choosing to knowingly shaft anyone uninformed who buy their cards all in the name of greed.

What a disgusting blatant disregard for consumers. NVIDIA is an absolute disgrace in the tech industry.

Relying on Redhat’s Fedora is quite a blunder if they go forward with that choice.

Redhat’s already shown us plenty why we shouldn’t trust them especially while they’re currently still owned and controlled by IBM.

Holding the use of a less restrictive license against the project because some unrelated party could come along and fork it without contributing back seems like a strange position to me.

While I’m not sure how to interpret this, I can answer the second which might help answer your first statement.

I’m also not really sure what that criticism of MIT is trying to say. Third party contributors don’t get paid for their work? GPL projects also don’t have to pay people submitting changes.

It’s not about payment but primarily about reciprocation:

[Case 1] I have a project licensed under MIT

P1: “Hey thanks for the contributions I’ll add your name to the MIT license.”
P2: “Dope, btw I see your company uses it for xyz can I see what the new project looks like?”
P1: “Fuck no”
P2: “You’re joking right”
P1: “MIT license, read it and weap”
End scene.

[Case 2] I have a project licensed under GPL-v(2,3 or AGPL-3.0)

P1: “Hey thanks for the contributions! Here’s the new changes.”
P2: “No worries and thanks! I hope the project improves even more.🫡”
End scene.

licensed under MIT

yeahh I’ll stick with Krita as it’s licensed under GPLv3

The MIT license helps capitalist overlords and leaves developers and users with nothing as the only thing that the MIT license requires is for the user/dev to essentially pay with exposure by sharing the MIT license that contains a list of contributors :/

The GPL license provides systemic trust as it requires users/devs to contribute any improvements to the project back to the developers under the same license hence ensuring the cycle of trust and furthering progress

Sources:

• Free and Open Source software licenses explained
• MIT License - Wikipedia
• GPL License - Wikipedia

Agreed, although I have a feeling the clickbait problem will persist thoughout youtube until the EU comes in again

Thank you EU (not you Belgium) for clapping back against dark patterns✊🌻🫡

This problem has been cancerous for the gaming industry for far too long.

mood and pain :/

The UK government learned the wrong thing from Bomb Rush Cyberfunk it seems

Yall are on the wrong side of history