to be fair, you can ask the same of many rust devs themselves

I assume they mean non-Xorg/wayland, but I really don’t know for sure.

which also removes the merits of you questioning if what he is claiming is fiction or not

yet you claim marcan is lina with zero proof?

I’m surprised they don’t just compel companies to build the backdoor into the client software itself rather than trying to remove or weaken the encryption. That way, E2EE continues to work properly.

If that does happen, I just hope there will be enough developers by then that can/will want to use it (as in, write rust code). Especially developers that can put up with the kernel process and its people.

Distros are still free to make their own RPM packages, they can’t go around the GPL there.

But having official flatpak release makes it very easy to update to the latest versions regardless of your distro.

I don’t consider myself hateful in the first place so I’m not aware of anything that needs changing, but I’m open to constructive criticism.

jmp.chat

This is why FOSS is so important. Then you can at least control the app and know that it’s not being updated with malicious code.

I 100% agree with you, and my apologies if I came off as hateful, I really don’t think I am, but my problems are only with the people who make it their entire identity as you say, they are just exhausting humans in general and I don’t really care how they want to identify or whatever, I would pose the same arguments to people of any persuasion if there was a sizeable number of them doing it.

Removed by mod

And SMTP/IMAP do not support end-to-end encryption, so a malicious server can still spy on you even if it uses TLS.

But I dislike that it requires even going that info

I never understood this stance… do people really think a corporation is going to risk their entire company over your anonymity when their country’s government does not allow this? Nobody is going to jail for you.

Plus, if everyone could easily sign up anonymously, then like they said, it would be overrun with bots and the reputation of their IPs would quickly deteriorate to where most other email providers would just block them, making the service almost worthless.

https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem/

By satellite do you mean like a dish physically plugged in with a cable? I wasn’t aware of any “app” used for that on any TV… I just switch the input with the remote to like HDMI/component/RF/etc. and the normal android tv interface goes away completely.

What “TV app” is this exactly? I’ve never seen or heard of that before, and none of my google/android TVs or dongles have anything like that.

Also what make and model TV is this?

By “default app” I assume you mean the launcher. Just google for “android tv launcher”.

If by “plain satellite TV” mean using one of the input sources on the TV (like HDMI, component, RF etc.)… this is unrelated to the launcher and would still work regardless of which one you used.

Sure, but I think chances are high that “your own” will be much slower than the others.

I feel like RISC-V has already been ruined by vendor-specific proprietary extensions.

Very well-written and informed response, thank you.