Well, that’s why you’ll have to try out. Or ask someone to at least try whether it opens, the apps mostly either fail on start because they require a Google certified Android, or they don’t fail at all.

Though it looks like that could change eventually with a Linux phone.

SailfishOS is mostly daily drivable, depends on which Android apps you need (there’s a compatibility layer to run Android apps on it), with bank apps it’s often a problem.

Titles that aren’t doing the titles.

That happens often, usually to people who have gone through a childhood full of arguing (not necessarily with them, might be the parents just fighting a lot).

I’m usually annoyed, not uncomfortable.

Yeah, my disk’s not even full.

I use Nobara, btw.

So, where are the people who were telling me how it’s a move in the right direction?

You have to subscribe to a community, otherwise you’re not getting any updates. If no one on your instance subscribes, you get no updates. Try setting up a bot account and make it subscribe to a bunch of communities.

For example using https://lemmy-federate.com/.

Now try the whole GOG catalog.

Ah, we have a senior developer here!

doas mv /usr/bin/doas /usr/bin/sudo

Problem solved!

Pff, I wish my overall taxation was only 30%.

Can’t you refund? Stating that the devs intentionally broke the game for you?

People don’t buy games overflowing with cheaters.

The biggest problem with Rust are its users. They somehow think that having a safe memory access means fewer bugs. While it only means fewer memory management related bugs. Which honestly isn’t even a problem with modern C++.

Yeah, if you hash your passwords with unsalted md5 it’s much more secure in Rust than PHP!

Unless you’re one of the lucky few whose body simply accepts the transplanted organ as its own.

I love these kind of stories because there’s not a single good side!

So, who do you root for? The all-content-stealing machine? Or the companies ran by people who are dead inside and think that lyrics to a song you paid for already should be copyrighted?

The textbook definition is being aggressive without partaking in direct aggression. A simple rule of thumb difference is that with passive aggressive behaviour you can pretend you didn’t know you were aggressive.

Like, if you throw a brick at your neighbour’s window while he’s watching TV - there’s no way you can twist it as meaning anything else. That’s the normal non-passive aggressive and you can’t really pretend you didn’t mean it the way you did it.

If you pour water in the middle of harsh winter in front of their door, that’s passive aggressive - you avoid direct confrontation (unless they happen to see you) but are aggressive towards them. He might suspect it’s you (you threw a brick through his window after all!) but he can’t prove it.

That’s what’s frustrating about passive aggression - everyone in the room (including the passive aggressive person, their target and any bystander) knows what’s going on, but it’s not direct so the aggressor can claim “omg I didn’t mean it that way.”