Computer vision * sorry

Is it an iPhone? They use IR to map your face where as (AFAIK) most Android just use CV, which is kinda my point. These would only help when IR is involved.

So, these actually work great when IR is used (for example you won’t be able to unlock your iPhone when wearing them), however my question is, does this help at all when just a normal photo is taken? You can wear these, have a ‘normal’ photo taken and it just looks like you’re wearing standard glasses. That could then be fed through CV, etc?

And Flock is partnering with Ring right? That’s neat.

That’s exactly my understanding/ thought process as well. I was wondering the same in terms of why an OEM would cooperate, and my first thought was the increase in hardware sales. I’m not sure how big the market is, but I know the security crowd will flock to them if they’re partnering with GOS when that market share would have previously been Googles. I’m not sure how big that market is or if the ‘juice would be worth the squeeze’.

Ew. Also, LibreWolf.

That’s fantastic. Does this help with the issue of Google releasing AOSP security updates at a slower cadence? Maybe working directly with an OEM resolves this?

SFF Optiplec are great. I went with a decently spec’d Intel NUC running Proxmox that handles all my home services nicely without using too much power.

Fully custom? Sick! Where do I get one? 😅

They also are buying the NSO group

https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/s1jgvmitgx

Oh this looks interesting, thank you. So you basically just backup the relevant parts of the file system and then use this to restore in case of an incident/ emergency? A little more hands on than just restoring from a Proxmox backup, but probably also more agnostic/ interoperable.

Are custom reactions still in the works?

Great interview; Love Lutris :)

Yeah, that’s a good point. For me it’s mostly family that is not very technical, so I’m not too concerned of them using a fork.

Poor security implementations that would become the weakest link in the security chain

Definitely. Capturing the messages isn’t my concern though as much as interacting with non authentic clients

Yes of course. Signal can archive messages and they can be restored, you can screenshot messages and you can have them backed up as part of a policy like icloud backups.

My question is more about how do you know you’re interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

This might feel bad, but honestly you’re still killing it. I graduated at like 30 after grinding out years and years of CC. You have great prospects, just stay focused

Why is Incogni bad?

Rsync or SCP?