Yeah we have to use windows at work but we are trying to move software development to support Linux. It’s just a bit hard when you have a monster codebase, bigger than the Linux kernel or Firefox, built using all Microsoft products. That being said, dotnet now supporting Linux is a huge positive
Saw posts about one on Lemmy today, seems to be pretty cheap too
What a terrible terrible idea
Yay for microplastics
Care to share?
Ah yes the halting problem
I think Anna’s archive continues from where they stopped
Didn’t scihub stop adding new articles years ago?
I’d be shocked if 4 got optimised out
That’s nuts
You should be reading the proposed changes before pushing yes. But regardless you can get stuck upgrading if you use only “upgrade” when dependences intentionally incompatibly change by package maintainers
The spam bots are out in full force. I have seen this spam everywhere I browse, in so many flavours and forms it’s exhausting
Remember that right wingers like serif fonts like times new roman and the preference for sans serif fonts (like calibri) increases as you become more left wing
No they are not. The kernel module is open, which is not the driver. You’ve been lied to
That doesn’t magically make HDMI 2.1 work on linux
Last I checked it requires a closed source binary upload that contains cryptographic keys
You can get rid of upgrade if you also use full-upgrade
full-upgrade probably a better pick
Still don’t understand the shutdown? Remove the marketing material and move on if it’s such a problem?
Certainly wasn’t a liquid