Far Cry 5 strangely has very enjoyable fishing.
I mod a worryingly growing list of communities. Ask away if you have any questions or issues with any of the communities.
I also run the hobby and nerd interest website scratch-that.org.
Far Cry 5 strangely has very enjoyable fishing.
Deep Rock Galactic.
There is a huge amount of loadout progression for each class, and a seemingly infinite amount of cosmetics to acquire. While there are only a limited number of mission types, the randomized nature of the level population and all of the various modifiers and enemy types that have been added keeps the game fresh. The game is entirely co-op with no PVP element, which keeps the tone more focused on helping other players instead of ever seeing them as competition.
Among other things. Though I only saw it as an adult, so I think I was influenced by similar things or influenced by works influenced by Wizards.
I went through a phase years ago where I was obsessed with copying Mignola. I’m over it, but some of the influence lingers.
Based on how verification was revoked for some users on Twitter based on their content rather than question of their identity, I’m cautious about this system turning into the status symbol it became on Twitter rather than the verification it claimed to be.
Unfortunately, the forecast isn’t good for the integrity of what should be a simple system. Under Dorsey, the Twitter blue checkmark had already become a tool for showing content approval by Twitter. In various instances users had their status removed based on their content and not on a question of if they were who they claimed to be.
I’m over here supporting Tamriel Rebuilt myself.
Tripcodes are not automatically applied. Default posting was anonymous, but a user could optionally post with a tripcode name.
Some boards like /pol/ introduced post IDs where a randomly generated code would follow your anonymous name within a thread, so others could see which comments within a thread were the same person. That system wasn’t site wide though, and it wasn’t a persistent account.
From the steam page:
“TotalSpend” is the total amount of external funds applied to your account.
“OldSpend” is the amount of external funds applied before Friday, April 17, 2015 18:00:00 UTC.
If it’s a round ball that’s .68 caliber, sure. I mean it’s a ball being launched.
However, are any waterballs even that size? And why? A waterball that was wet would probably jam up, so you’d end up shooting a dry one and it seems like a lot of effort to reinvent the wheel.
You asked what package only means, and I found an answer.
Total is total, with old spend being the cutoff of old spending.
None of the numbers are guaranteed to add up to each other.
I don’t know what’s missing from the reply.
RA2
Have you seen DORF?
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2388620/DORF_RealTime_Strategic_Conflict/
It’s a remaster of 2033 with a bunch of tweaks to mechanics and improved visuals.
The last time I bought a game for $40 was in 2014, the last time I paid $60 was in 2011 (and it was a mistake).
While there will always be an endless surge of people willing to pay whatever price game companies demand and those people can’t be convinced to care enough to change, if you’re reading this I hope you’re the kind of person who can look into the effectively infinite backlog of games that already exist and into the indie and AA space for new games at decent prices done with some actual passion.
From the page with the values:
“OldSpend” is the amount of external funds applied before Friday, April 17, 2015 18:00:00 UTC.
From Steam support regarding package only:
This row includes the portion of the account’s total funds spent that could not be transferred. For example, a hardware purchase, gifted game, or in-game item does not count toward Package Only Spend, but a game purchase for your own library would.
Well not how much you’ve spent, how much it values your collection. But what’s that number based on?
Please re-read the article. The values are on Steam itself, based on your interactions with it.
Oh boy a Star Citizen thread.
Not based on an existing object, just a fighter design I’ve been toying with for a while. I like the action figure sensibility of having moving parts to snap into attack mode.
The back set of wings is supposed to be just long enough to clear the forward wings and line up. Measurements say it works but a failure of fully accounting for perception of perspective.
Stick some money in your walls. I’ll get it.