Ultimately you either have basically google stadia (with all its technical problems) or you are trusting the client to render the game.
Even if the client only has exactly the absolute minimum amount of information needed to draw all the things that are visible, that still allows a cheat to see the player coordinates and the coordinates of visible entities, which usually makes eg. an aimbot trivial to make.
“Never trust the client” renders entire genres of games inaccessible for a big corporation. But those genres have billions of dollars of potential profit in them. So they will go as far as they can to make the client almost trustable. The average player of a first-person shooter doesn’t really think about the implications of kernel-level anticheat at all so it’s not a hard choice for them. 95% of them are on windows after all and that already gives kenel access to their PC to some entity they really have no good reason to trust.
Those 3,028 people, or 0.000036% of the global population, hold more than 99% of all wealth.
The actual number is closer to 9% than 99%. This is probably some kind of mutation from “the combined wealth of billionaires is larger than the GDP of 99% of countries” where notably yearly income and wealth are not directly comparable.
Better (and true) things to say are “The global top 1% have more wealth than the bottom 95% combined” or “The richest 0.01% in the US have tripled their wealth in the last 30 years, while 90% of people have been treading water”
Probably
So I wondered a bit how much it actually affects the economy.
“S&P 500” companies’ market cap is about 57 trillion dollars with a P/E ratio of about 30. So openai by itself is dragging down the total s&p 500 earnings by only about 0.5%. The bigger problem is that there are multiple companies like openAI, and a large chunk of the entire economy’s valuation is tied to the promise that all the AI companies will somehow become profitable sometime soon.
Nah, it was found sometime before november 24 2021, publicly disclosed in december 9 2021, and only used by 2b2t players on december 10 2021.
The small amount of sales of doom 2 today is not at all comparable to the massive amount of minecraft sales and minecraft-related microtransactions that microsoft is raking in. Doom has many modern sequels that are far more popular today than doom 2, while minecraft does not have any official sequel.
SteamOS for Desktop is imminent
Do you have some source? I recall the latest rumor related to a valve patent is more likely to be about some VR thing than a steamOS PC
Most people may miss this detail, but “pisscorp” comes from the old discord logo’s stylized Ds looking like a hebrew letter that is pronounced almost like P
Originally planned to post it in this format but thought too much reaction within reaction would be bad (and including mr. theo ai glazer felt questionable)
club penguin (it’s ok, the twitter reply formatting is impossible to understand)
Nim is more “high level, automatic memory management by default, but you can go 100% manual if you need to”, though the reality of doing that is basically the opposite of rust’s “everything you need to do is well-documented and solid”
Nim is a compiled language by default, and supposedly cross-compilation is usually as simple as
apt install mingw-w64
nim c -d:mingw myproject.nim
though I haven’t really tried doing it (and my general impression of nim is anything “slightly obscure” like cross-compilation still has a non-zero risk of running into unexpected thorny bugs)
I remember tab groups showing up one day by themselves maybe a week ago, and then I quickly clicked about two buttons and now they’re totally gone and I almost forgot they were a thing. But likely if I had summarily clicked 2 different buttons it might have been turned on without me realizing it, and that would cause the model to be downloaded and the CPU cycles to be spent (at least if I kept the tab groups on)
Video has general VPN background info:
A VPN is ultimately just someone else’s computer that routes traffic through it, and there is nothing stopping you from starting your own VPN company, promising you’re not logging anything, and then logging everything you can. You are almost certainly never going to be punished in any way for lying to your customers as long as you put in a minimal amount of effort.
Some VPN companies like to make ridiculous claims like “the vpn will prevent you from getting hacked” which is not true
For 95-99% of internet users (at least in western countries) a VPN doesn’t really help with privacy at all since your browser is most likely still easily fingerprintable. UBlock origin or similar things help but are not even close enough to stop all fingerprinting, you need something like tor browser with javascript disabled to actually get your browser privacy to the level where a VPN is relevant. (Though it does have other benefits like circumventing some geoblocking, making unencrypted websites slightly safer, etc)
You ought to manually configure DNS, possibly even try to self-host
touched upon in the video but not directly explained, almost all VPN companies just rent from cloud services instead of hosting it themselves so even if they didn’t personally log anything, all the network traffic is likely actually still being logged by amazon etc
governments and police can just get court orders to get all the data from VPNs, or even force them to start logging if they didn’t already, though this is probably not a problem for you if you’re not considered an exceptionally interesting person
generally trusted VPNs are mullvad, IVPN, ProtonVPN, the only one I’ll personally point out is mullvad who have cohosted servers which should bypass the cloud related issues, though you had to manually select a non-cloud server last time I checked
As for more or less unique info specific to this video, it claims that VPNs lying about not collecting user data is indeed very common and done by ad companies that buy out VPN companies etc, and government spying agencies also operating VPN companies as honeypots
yep, it’s almost all banana pi, and at least 4 different ‘models’ of it it seems. But the word is also used in some string processing tests and as an example comment of how suffix arrays work…
And most of those cases are of course using the word sarcastically
The next function to implement is called, amazingly, next(); its job is to
move the iterator forward to the next position in the sequence.
if (lc->sync == NOSYNC)
for (i = lc->header.nr_regions; i < lc->region_count; i++)
/* FIXME: amazingly inefficient */
log_set_bit(lc, lc->clean_bits, i);
else
for (i = lc->header.nr_regions; i < lc->region_count; i++)
/* FIXME: amazingly inefficient */
log_clear_bit(lc, lc->clean_bits, i);
/*
* Amazingly, if ehv_bc_tty_open() returns an error code, the tty layer will
* still call this function to close the tty device. So we can't assume that
* the tty port has been initialized.
*/
* this header was blatantly ripped from netfilter_ipv4.h
* it's amazing what adding a bunch of 6s can do =8^)
/*
* I studied different documents and many live PROMs both from 2.30
* family and 3.xx versions. I came to the amazing conclusion: there is
* absolutely no way to route interrupts in IIep systems relying on
* information which PROM presents. We must hardcode interrupt routing
* schematics. And this actually sucks. -- zaitcev 1999/05/12
* corresponding ABS_X and ABS_Y events. This turns the Twiddler into a game
* controller with amazing 18 buttons :-)
* In an amazing feat of design, the Enhanced Features Register (EFR)
* shares the address of the Interrupt Identification Register (IIR).
* Access to EFR is switched on by writing a magic value (0xbf) to the
* Line Control Register (LCR). Any interrupt firing during this time will
* see the EFR where it expects the IIR to be, leading to
* "Unexpected interrupt" messages.
* Thanks BUGabundo and Malmostoso for your amazing help!
It’s a technicality about the pointer type. You can cast the type away which typically doesn’t change the actual value (but I’m pretty sure that causes undefined behavior)
For your example, int x = 0xDEADBEEF; signifies the integer -559038737 (at least on x86.)
char *p = (char*)0xDEADBEEF; on the other hand may or may not point to the real memory address 0xDEADBEEF, depending on factors like if the processor is using virtual or real addressing, etc
No shit sherlock. Rendering requires information about the game, and that information is enough to allow cheating. Aimbots don’t need to perform “invalid actions” in order to wreck a game. They just need to be faster and more accurate than most human players. Trying to heuristically detect aimbots is also commonly used alongside other anticheat methods, it just doesn’t work (unless you have people manually reviewing individual reported cheaters, but companies try to avoid that because it’s expensive and risks false positives).