On continue.
On continue.
Finding someone beautiful or attractive doesn’t challenge or reveal anything about your sexuality. You’re free!
Thanks for taking the time to explain :)
If the ACAB post is just words, then no. If it’s imagery of people being beaten by cops, then yes. There’s no need to argue extremes to make the point seem ridiculous – just use judgment and be kind.
It’s about being considerate; that’s where the conversation starts and ends, so don’t get sidetracked or focus on semantics. It does not matter why someone is browsing any website at their place of work, so let’s not even bring that into the conversation. NFSW is meant to help people view content at work/in public by making it avoidable. It’s a communication from the author/community to the audience that the content may or may not be inappropriate – that’s it. If it’s debatable and isn’t tagged, that’s inconsiderate and a request to tag it should be treated with consideration and kindness (barring trolls, which OP clearly isn’t).
But that’s just my opinion, and I acknowledge yours is different.
Just because there’s no nudity doesn’t mean it’s safe-for-work. This would absolutely make my female colleagues uncomfortable and that falls under the spirit of NSFW. Getting pedantic about what is or isn’t pornographic or nudity to justify having gross pictures up on your screen is entirely beside the point – if there’s any reason it could contribute to a less equitable workplace, it should be labeled NSFW. If there’s any debate about it at all, it’s the considerate thing to do.
“Violently high” is kind of funny, like saying you’ll get seditiously lazy later
Thanks for the reply! PEBKAC issue – I was logged in with the right account, but the email I requested to join the beta from was not a google account so I had to make one for this. I forgot to change the email in my Walkscape account portal to the gmail I made. All good now!
I was accepted into the beta, but I’m unable to find the app in the store. I joined the google group, but I’m not sure what else to check. When I follow the link it shows the app in the browser, but when I try to find it with the play store app it can’t be found. Any ideas?
Sometimes the food can do it too – I scratched my last nonstick pan with a silicone spatula because I ground black pepper on my eggs and caught a craggy piece just right while flipping. After being super careful for months! So irritated.
I’m curious about what the tilt would do to fan bearing wear. Probably negligible for such lightweight components
I think you still have it upside-down? The wrist is the bottom of the tattoo, so while doing pullups it would be inverted. It’s legible while standing, shaking hands, reaching out, etc.
Pretty sure it’s an upside-down forearm; note their hair toward the bottom-left of the photo.
Just a short while ago I was invited to dinner at a friend’s. Wouldn’t you know it – rounded couch. Immediately called CPS and got their kids sent somewhere they can have a chance at a decent upbringing.
Same issues with Pop!_OS – I’m having a much better time on Nobara. But you’re making me want to try Kubuntu… still haven’t found my happiest place but I’m happy :)
1.033e92849
if anyone else was curious.
My b, I thought you wanted to know the origin of the meme.
I mean it’s on you to manage boxing and unboxing in your projects
Here you go, from the repo:
const visitAd = function (ad) {
function timeoutError(xhr) {
return onVisitError.call(xhr, {
type: 'timeout'
});
}
const url = ad && ad.targetUrl, now = markActivity();
// tell menu/vault we have a new attempt
broadcast({
what: 'adAttempt',
ad: ad
});
if (xhr) {
if (xhr.delegate.attemptedTs) {
const elapsed = (now - xhr.delegate.attemptedTs);
// TODO: why does this happen... a redirect?
warn('[TRYING] Attempt to reuse xhr from ' + elapsed + " ms ago");
if (elapsed > visitTimeout)
timeoutError();
}
else {
warn('[TRYING] Attempt to reuse xhr with no attemptedTs!!', xhr);
}
}
ad.attempts++;
ad.attemptedTs = now;
if (!validateTarget(ad)) return deleteAd(ad);
return sendXhr(ad);
// return openAdInNewTab(ad);
// return popUnderAd(ad)
};
const sendXhr = function (ad) {
// if we've parsed an obfuscated target, use it
const target = ad.parsedTargetUrl || ad.targetUrl;
log('[TRYING] ' + adinfo(ad), ad.targetUrl);
xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
try {
xhr.open('get', target, true);
xhr.withCredentials = true;
xhr.delegate = ad;
xhr.timeout = visitTimeout;
xhr.onload = onVisitResponse;
xhr.onerror = onVisitError;
xhr.ontimeout = onVisitError;
xhr.responseType = ''; // 'document'?;
xhr.send();
} catch (e) {
onVisitError.call(xhr, e);
}
}
const onVisitResponse = function () {
this.onload = this.onerror = this.ontimeout = null;
markActivity();
const ad = this.delegate;
if (!ad) {
return err('Request received without Ad: ' + this.responseURL);
}
if (!ad.id) {
return warn("Visit response from deleted ad! ", ad);
}
ad.attemptedTs = 0; // reset as visit no longer in progress
const status = this.status || 200, html = this.responseText;
if (failAllVisits || status < 200 || status >= 300) {
return onVisitError.call(this, {
status: status,
responseText: html
});
}
try {
if (!isFacebookExternal(this, ad)) {
updateAdOnSuccess(this, ad, parseTitle(this));
}
} catch (e) {
warn(e.message);
}
xhr = null; // end the visit
};
That’s pretty much it! Let me know if it doesn’t make sense, I can annotate it
Weird number of downvotes here – I thought they were meant for low-effort or non contributive comments, not an “I disagree” button. This person is giving a unique perspective as a subscriber (in this thread, anyway) and should be met with curiosity, I think. It is helpful to know that there are people who enjoy paying for it, so thanks for giving your opinion here.
I disagree because they have a dominant position for reasons other than having a good product – they squash competition trying to make the space better while themselves actively making it worse. Subscribing means supporting that style of inhibiting innovation, not to mention the other user-hostile practices they embrace (extend, extinguish). They are an ad company and obligated to make a profit, I get that, but I refuse to abide this style of using investor money to operate at a loss for years while deceptively capturing the market before raising prices. If your product is good, it shouldn’t need to be artificially propped up.