Correct. I prefer to avoid the browsers that use their browser engine.

I have used Zen a lot since the early days and it has been very good. Suits my needs perfectly. However, recently I started testing out Orion and it has also been very nice. It has very good privacy and is WebKit if you’re into that. I’m just happy with anything not Blink.

Here is a pretty good write up on it. They aren’t that different but generally I think mkv is preferred in high quality since it can handle more tracks and more codecs.

comments like these that imply that jellyfin is a direct replacement for Plex when you yourself say it’s not.

I didn’t say that. I agree with it though. They aren’t 1:1.

I’m not arguing with me about the merits of you using Plex. Entirely possible it suits your needs better. But most important to many of us is the ability to run offline. Once you’re online, you’re right that Jellyfin has some ground to make up.

Nobody is running Jellyfin strictly offline. At the bare minimum people leave it internet connectable to grab metadata and other resources,

I run it offline, in a network that doesn’t even have a path from the outside world. I have a separate gluetun network for getting metadata outside the media server. Even still, connecting to the internet is a vastly different security service that allowing connections from the internet.

I wouldn’t even really debate any of your negative points about Jellyfin; all true. I’m just saying Jellyfin is a replacement for Plex in many cases, even if not yours. For me, where I want to run offline a service that doesn’t force me to log into a cloud server to watch my own stuff on my own network, it is a replacement. And on top of that, I just like it more. I like the interface more and feel its syncplay is less problematic.

It seems strange to me that you feel a service which forces you to log into a cloud service then leaks private data is somehow better than a service that allows users to operate strictly offline.

Could have used oneOf or exactlyOne, but or is definitely a bad choice.

Worth mentioning you are a okay not to update.

Glad to see this shared again. This tool is legendary.

They aren’t; it isn’t languishing at all. It is being actively developed. Check out the commit log.

They also abandoned it. It has been picked up by the Linux Foundation though, which is exciting.

What? Map projections are not projected to manipulate you psychologically. They are projected to manipulate a three dimensional object onto a two dimensional surface.

You can install a wireguard spk from blackvoid - Wireguard SPK for your Synology NAS.

Oh boy! Are you serious? Let me be more precise, in case. There aren’t actual projections that are better in all cases than the Mercator projection. There are maps that are better in given cases. ALL maps have trade offs. The one you shared, included. It certainly benefits from the humor of pointing out why this is an issue in the first place.

https://xkcd.com/977/

I don’t believe that 99% figure for a second. Unless geography is removed from all curricula worldwide. Even still, that ignorance would not signify what this movement implies. It is a useful map; end of story. If the movement were, “We should increase public knowledge of geography and how projections work,” fine. But it isn’t.

There aren’t better maps. Only maps with different tradeoffs. ALL 2d maps of spheres are disproportionate.

This is such a garbage take. There is no way to “show our world as it truly is” in two dimensions. I’m all about showing other projects and orientations. Classrooms should have “upside down” maps and Albert maps for example. But we should also teach that each projection has benefits and drawbacks. I was taught that decades ago. Have we stopped?

I love Zen.

Bonus points is you run a fork bomb in parallel and see how far you get. Throw an egg on your heat sink for fun.

You mean when streaming video bandwidth, bidirectionally across the radio?

Python is strongly typed. I get your point since it is dynamically typed, but still strongly.