If you are at a business you should have an access point or router that is capable of blocking specific devices from WAN access. But I would create a new segmented network, block that network from WAN access entirely, put it on its own VLAN, and then connect the TV to that network.

That doesn’t, unless you’ve blocked your TV from network access, because they use ACR - Automated Content Recognition - that literally scans what is being displayed over your hdmi port and then sells it off to advertisers.

Yeah this title is terrible. They mean three models.

Looks like they answered why already!

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/01/cachyos-founder-explains-why-they-didn-t-join-the-new-open-gaming-collective-ogc/

So, once again you are incapable of explaining how it’s not carbon neutral, though you think you are. Carbon neutrality has nothing to do with development costs and construction costs are almost always dwarfed by running costs (which I literally mentioned if you would bother reading).

You’re just angry it’s not a miracle machine.

I’m not the one getting angry. You are making a bunch of bullshit claims and then getting mad that people don’t believe your lies.

They’re an “optimized for gaming and high speed workloads” distribution as far as I understand. Lots of customizations to GPU drivers and what not for games.

We switched to symmetrical gigabit the moment it was available, in fact we were one of the first in the state. I’m never going back. In 5 years we’ve only had to call for help once and they didn’t need to come out to do anything. They were able to fix the issue over the phone in about 5-10 minutes. The rest of the time the internet just fucking works.

Amazing how offering a working product gets you customers.

Wonder why CachyOS isn’t in the group.

Edit: wonder no more. https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/01/cachyos-founder-explains-why-they-didn-t-join-the-new-open-gaming-collective-ogc/

It is though. Think of it this way. You are a spy, you are communicating with someone over Signal. Signal is e2e. The person you are talking with doesn’t know you are a spy. They’ve verified that Signal is working and yet their secrets keep getting out. They go to law enforcement and say “they’re a spy” and you say “no I’m not, it’s e2e, nothing could have been getting out!”.

If you can read the text on the screen, then it’s past the point of e2e. e2e is just about transmission. It has nothing to do with the endpoints.

In this case Meta can utilize iOS App Groups which allows applications by the same company to access shared data. So imagine the easiest to understand scenario.

You get a message on WhatsApp. Your Operating System takes a screenshot of the message, and sends it off to the FBI. Nothing has broken e2e here. Your OS can’t be trusted (in this example).

Now let’s expand it:

• You get a message on WhatsApp
• WhatsApp takes a screenshot of the message and saves it to its storage. It does NOTHING ELSE WITH IT.
• Facebook (which you also have installed) now accesses that shared data store, utilizing iOS App Groups, takes the screenshot, and sends it to Meta.

Nothing has broken e2e here. The client can’t be trusted, so no matter what you do, e2e doesn’t have to be broken, since the company is untrustworthy. They can claim e2e, implement fully working auditable e2e, and still exfiltrate your data.

Of course, WhatsApp probably isn’t taking screenshots. They can just save off the text after they decrypt it (even if they use the Signal protocol).

There are lots of claims going around, but the physics just isn’t there. Battery storage density isn’t high enough currently (and doesn’t look to be close) to support large planes. It’s the same problem as with 18 wheelers. The larger the vehicle, the battery size increases superlinearly, not linearly. Because adding in battery storage increases the weight required to carry the vehicle, thus increasing the battery storage needs, thus … and so on. With liquid fuel, the weight is variable based on the passengers, and the weight drops as the flight continues, thus increasing fuel efficiency the more weight is lost.

No, but I did go in shorts and a t shirt. So I had to leave in those clothes too.

No I’m asking you to explain how it’s not carbon neutral. I do not give one shit about the cost, I do not give one shit about how much the gas it produces costs (for reference the Porsche plant is at over $40 a LITER). You have stated it’s not carbon neutral. Explain how. If the machine does what it says then it is carbon neutral.

I have an electric car, I do not care about this machine. But I do care when people claim something and have zero evidence to back it up.

That was the joke yes.

I’ve done that before. It sucked cause it was also 14°F out. So I had to drive home in the cold while wet.

They look angry.

Please do explain how it’s wrong. Go on, I’ll wait.

Meta Is Being Sued Over Whether WhatsApp Really Encrypts Your Messages

No, they’re being sued over whether Meta can read your messages, not whether e2e is implemented. I covered this in a different comment the other day, but these are not mutually exclusive, which is why Meta can be completely truthful about e2e encryption being on and yet the lawsuit can still be correct.

If you could link that it would be great. As far as I understand it, a commercial passenger plane (which holds several hundred people) is no where close to being possible. If you are talking about small planes that hold maximum ten-15 people then sure.

The efficiency doesn’t matter (to a point of manufacturing solar cells, or wind turbines, or whatever your equipment is for your renewable energy source). If all of the gasoline is generated from the air using renewable energy, it could take 100x the energy and still be completely carbon neutral. Carbon neutrality is based on the amount of excess carbon added to the air. If no carbon is added then by definition it’s carbon neutral.

Porsche already has a factory in Chile that is doing this exact same thing at a much larger scale.

Wait, so openai actually understands the meaning of removing consent? And this author clearly doesn’t?