atari vcs (from before it was rebranded to atari 2600)

exactly. But what if there were more than just three (the infamous “guardrails”)

the downvote wasn’t from me

so?

this isn’t low effort. These are freaking great!

three, point, oh

for copy and paste.

Not one, but three point oh!

what trend? they made thi ipod, they made the iphone, they’ve been late, really really late, for very basic features on either. And a bunch of just plain bad stuff.

Butterfly keyboards, magic mouse, touch bar on macs, not cherry picked at all. There are tons of examples

i haven’t come across many. But i have written a lot.

you should own your data. So yes

cryptic != complex. Are they cryptic? yes. Are they complex? not really, if you can understand “one or more” or “zero or more” and some other really simple concepts like “one of these” or “not one of these” or “this is optional”. You could explain these to a child. It’s only because they look cryptic that people think they are complex. Unless you start using backreferences and advanced concepts like those (which are not usually needed in most cases) they are very simple. long != complex

it is perfectly descriptive. It is not a forum. I wish it was, but those went pretty much extinct. If they called it a forum it’d be lying

bully for you :)

yes, “complex” regexes are quite simple too. Complex regexes are long, not difficult. They appear complex because you have to “inline” everything. They really are not that hard.

Don’t. It’s a horrible overheating piece of crap. I literally cannot shoot more than about 3 minutes of video with the flash turned on (at 1080p, not 4k, and not encoding as hevc either). The phone overheats and turns off the flash.

Keeping the phone in my pocket, out of direct sunlight in my car? I see the “3d buildings have been disabled because your phone needs to cool down” every single day. And I live in Malta; in the summer it’s a 20 minute trip, at most.

And even then, the battery life sucks anyway.

Android 16 is buggy af too, though that’s not specific to the 7a.

does the regex search for what you wanted to? Does it work in all cases? Can I be confident that it will find all instances i care about, or will I still have to comb the code manually?

tests can never prove correctness of code. All they can prove is “the thing hasn’t failed yet”. Proper reasoning is always needed if you want a guarantee.

If you had the llm write the regex for you, I can practically guarantee that you won’t think of, and write tests for, all the edge cases.

that would be more believable if they didn’t release the apple vision pro.

Or the years they took biding their time before they finally implemented battery charge time estimation on ios.

Or the time biding their time refining, erm, copy and paste?

Come on!

oh for fuck’s sake. A mistake is rendering the wrong emoji. Sending your password to elsewhere is inexcusable

and the only reason it’s not slowing you down on other things is that you don’t know enough about those other things to recognize all the stuff you need to fix

yes they can. I regularly do. Regexes aren’t hard to write, their logic is quite simple. They’re hard to read, yes, but they are almost always one-offs (ex, substitutions in nvim).