Direct link: https://www.moddb.com/mods/quake-ii-call-of-the-void

It’s different SKUs on Switch 1 and 2 and the Switch2 version costs 10 Euro more.

No

I think this is a bit more involved than extended file format support.

I didn’t say “use the other rootkit instead”.

“Owned By China” and “Owned by China 2”.

Luckily I never heard of this before, so my disappointment is manageable.

EDIT: LOL, depends on a CCP rootkit. Only idiots would install this.

Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It’s the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.

WebM is just Mastroska with most features disabled that are not relevant to streaming and a mandated set of codecs, so basic Mastroska support would have been possible years ago, simply by accepting the Matroska MIME types.

Maybe later

And also most scripts need to be executed in a posix-compliant shell.

That’s why there is that shebang thingie in first line. Distributions like Debian use an entire different shell from bash for scripts: https://manpages.debian.org/buster/dash/dash.1.en.html

I HIGHLY recommend using bash and zsh as posix-compliant shells at the beginning

Why? All the usual shell scripts don’t use Fish as interpreter.

reinstalling Fish right now

Alright:

> /usr/bin/fish --version
fish, version 4.0.1

For whatever reason openSUSE doesn’t ship 4.0.2 despite the fact that it’s in its development repo since months. Oh well, could be worse.

Fixed in fish 4.0 :)

*reinstalling Fish right now*

I really like Fish but for simple stuff like youtube-dl you always have to put quotation marks around the YouTube video’s address because Fish thinks the question mark is an operator. So annoying.

What gave you the impression that I thought it would?

What gave the completely irrational impression that filing a bug report before commenting was a requirement?

Right but presumably they chose the names?

I don’t know.

It’s not a requirement to file a bug report before you comment on anything. Don’t be silly.

It’s not a requirement but if anything is silly it’s acting as if an alpha version is the final release and complaining in a random forum would change anything.

Normally when people develop a feature they do it once and then it’s “done”

The feature (boot manager) was not developed by KDE. They rely in systemd components which are all in active development.

So did you file a bug report or are you just being negative in a forum the developers will probably never read?

You really think they’re going to revisit this?

I reserve my judgement until a final release is made.

That’s not really how software development works.

How does it work, then? Have you filed a bug report?

I really don’t understand why people have this little awareness of usability.

It’s an alpha release.

Is it really ready?

It’s an alpha release.