• Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, some guys cherry picked 17 studies from the last half a century or so and found “a significant positive association between broadly defined cat ownership and an increased risk of schizophrenia-related disorders.” despite many studies finding no relationship between the two. Well, good job. I’m sure that will be good for a research grant from someone who doesn’t pay too close attention to applications.

    Also, what the fuck is “broadly defined cat ownership”?

  • stray@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are some important things to keep in mind here, like the fact that 15 of the 17 studies were case-control studies.

    This kind of research can’t show cause and effect, and it often doesn’t account for factors that may have affected both the exposure and the outcome.

    The researchers also highlight the low quality of a number of the examined studies.

    Results were inconsistent across studies, but those of higher quality suggested that associations in unadjusted models might have been due to factors that could have influenced the results.

    I appreciate having an article on this topic, but the headline is a little strong.

    A full half of the global human population is infected with toxoplasma gondii, and human infection isn’t associated with cat-ownership, so that explanation seems unlikely.