• arsCynic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Honestly I think ID verification on the Web isn’t a bad thing. I know a professional (highly paid) propagandist in real life which made me fear trolling and masquerading as someone else is way more prevalent than assumed, because trolling on the Web is part of what he does. I’d love to see a forum where I didn’t have to second guess whether users are bots/trolls and there are no people using tens if not hundreds of accounts to skew votes.

    Obviously it shouldn’t be for-profit unethical corporations that handle this, but well-run governments.

    • arsCynic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      15 downvotes, 0 proper counter-arguments. If someone’s missing something so obvious, it should be equally trivial to explain.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Zero Knowledge ID, multiple possible verifies, only binary questions answered.

      Are you over 18 = True/False

      No other personal information escapes.

      • arsCynic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Could you elaborate on “multiple possible verifies” please? Unsure what you mean by that.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Zk certificates can be issued by multiple entities all attesting the validity the same piece of information. Governments, companies and your mate Dave could all add weight to a zk proof.

          The zk part just hides the input data. A zk proof guarantees validity, not truth.