Jeena@piefed.jeena.net to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoAre monorepos really simpler?www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down13
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-linkAre monorepos really simpler?www.youtube.comJeena@piefed.jeena.net to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoI mean, with large swaths of big tech companies running monorepos, does this statement really stand up to scrutiny? For one data point, Google has >2 billion slocs in their monorepo.
minus-squarePup Biru@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 hours agogoogle does a lot of things that just aren’t realistic for the large majority of cases before kubernetes, you couldn’t just reference borg and say “well google does it” and call it a day
I mean, with large swaths of big tech companies running monorepos, does this statement really stand up to scrutiny?
For one data point, Google has >2 billion slocs in their monorepo.
google does a lot of things that just aren’t realistic for the large majority of cases
before kubernetes, you couldn’t just reference borg and say “well google does it” and call it a day