Pup Biru

corpos aren’t who you’re protecting against with encrypted drives… they’re not going to gain access to anything via bypassing your OS: they get everything via software you’ve installed or things like tracking

the main thing you’re protecting against with encryption is theft (or if you think you’re being physically targeted, it also stops them from modifying your system… eg replacing your kernel or a binary that gives them access somehow)

perhaps try puppy play… i made another reply to OP to explain, but it’s kinda the same thing but gives your brain something to focus on

also puppy play! i like to say puppy play is like active mindfulness: instead of focusing on nothing in order to exist in the moment, you pretend you’re a dog and focus on that… dogs don’t pay rent, have jobs, worry about politics, etc… dogs just play, so just play and be in the moment

you get drawn into it, and it works incredibly well for people that get bored with things like meditation

the more you do the easier it is, and the main thing that breaks the headspace is feeling self conscious, but that’s freeing too! once you realise it’s fine to be ridiculous - that nobody cares - it helps with so many other parts of enjoying life (including other kinds of BDSM: people often say puppy play is a gateway kink exactly for this reason)

local storage isolation is the less interesting part, because that’s achieved much more cleanly with containers… profiles allow a kinda separate instance of your browser with different browser settings, addons, addon configuration, bookmarks, etc

i guess you’d need to expose both options: the ability to sync some profiles to some accounts and others to another… for example, i probably wouldn’t want my personal profile to sync to my work devices but id want my work profiles to sync between each other and be accessible from some of my home devices

totally; and i think that’s very fair for the large majority of use-cases… most people don’t need different browser settings: they just need different local storage

containers are for general browsing; profiles are for the whole browser

profiles allow you to have different addons installed, different configurations between addons in different profiles, different browser settings (eg a SOCKS proxy for work profile, or a different default search engine, default fonts, etc… or for technical users you can have a profile with experimental settings turned on)

also different addons, and different configuration for addons etc

profiles also allow different addons and addon configurations, default fonts, browser config, etc… it’s kinda like having a whole other user account or a whole other copy of the browser, rather than just cookie and storage isolation

ah yup that’s all very true!

i’m not sure that it could exist at most other levels… perhaps tone and name calling, but im not sure that the contradiction level is a fallacy: there’s no active intent there (not that active intent is required; i’m just not sure of the words right now)

like you’re stating the opposite case but that’s not intending to mislead exactly, and simply doing so isn’t harmful to the dialogue - it’s just not super helpful

i think it’s an action rather than a tactic, if that makes sense?

i’d say fallacies in general are the same kinda thing as as hominem attacks… things that muddy the waters without even trying to address the point

which they handled about as well as you can: prompt and clear notification without trying to pass the buck

the potential of a data breach is just a fact of life with any SAAS product - bugs happen… and it’s exactly the SAAS part of the product that makes the invites/login/aggregation of servers so smooth

there are some admin endpoints that are authenticated using any local IP, but the method they use allows spoofing the IP so those endpoints become accessible essentially without authentication

there were some other issues to do with unauthenticated enumeration and playback of content i believe too

i’m not likely to wrangle installing and maintaining wireguard on my mums cheap smart tv

and if that’s the solution, as i said you get plex local playback so that’s free still anyway

my main issues

• jellyfin has known security vulnerabilities and shouldn’t be run on a public network. that means everyone using your server remotely needs to be on a VPN… and then you may as well use plex because it’s “local” so the remote streaming thing doesn’t apply
• swiftfin (which i need for apple tv) doesn’t support media segments

the thing that everyone always glosses over is that jellyfin should not be run on a public network. it has known security vulnerabilities… that includes VPN remote proxy, so now you have to have external users on your actual VPN, and if that’s the case then plex will work fine because it’s “local”, and has a lot more features

(and my main issue: media segments don’t work on swiftfin)

the mozilla foundation is largely responsible for the whole adtech and ai slop nonsense that nobody asked for

the mozilla corporation is responsible for firefox. there is no way to support firefox development

absolutely this

CSP is also a possibility, but really you’re talking about an internal attack on your own infrastructure: either by infra teams on your production or devs on your infrastructure (or an external malicious actor able to deploy code)… i think that’s just so unlikely that it’s not worthy of concern unless you’re something like a bank

i wish they wouldn’t add a built in adblocker… i just want it to be the most minimal browser engine, and i want to be able to choose the adblocker