going straight from nothing to 30g/day (RDI) absolutely causes diarrhoea because it irritates your gut lining
if you follow directions like metamucil has to increase by a g or 2 per week then you’ll be right
you also need insoluble fibre, and psyllium only has soluble fibre
adjacent YSKs:
red light cameras - at least in australia - are stock standard canon DSLRs… they take images, but not video
there are some newer ones that do things like photos of people using their phones stopped at lights etc, but generally speed/red light and “single purpose” cameras will just be doing stills, and wouldn’t be too useful for anything other than a single photo when the sensor triggers it
that’s all irrelevant though… the rule is the rule and they got caught
people should be allowed to have awards for games which only use humans, and if a game is caught cheating they should be disqualified
if they want to compete for some awards, these aren’t the awards for them: there are others
it’s kinda irrelevant to the make it to production part though: the rule is no gen ai used during development… there’s no ifs, buts, or maybes here: there definitively was, and nobody is denying that
it’s irrelevant whether you agree with the rule or not… the award is for games that didn’t use AI during development. the game should not have originally been in contention for the award
i tend to agree this is the right way to use AI assets, but this isn’t the award for them… it doesn’t matter if it was accidental, if it was removed before release, or anything else
blowback and rallying your enemies.
imo exactly what’s happened with russia… pre-full-scale invasion nobody gave a shit about russia… even crimea tbh people were mostly indifferent
now? i dont know anyone real that doesn’t think the whole country can go to hell, and that russia always lies
the standard reaction to hearing about undersea cables being cut is: fuck russia; we should bomb their fucking ships those absolute cunts - even if we have no idea if it’s russia or not!
win or lose in ukraine, russia has lost so much - at least for the short-term
i would wager that these quickly get perverted
The software had a limit on the size of the feature file that was below its doubled size. That caused the software to fail.
this is not a rust problem… nor was the original problem of code writing entries to a file multiple times, and nor is the thing that made it worse: propagation of the poisoned file
the cloudflare issues were configuration… they have nothing even remotely relayed to any of this
github copilot is fantastic for exactly this reason… completes a few lines, auto corrects, automatic find and replace, automatically fills a 3 line function body that would otherwise be an extra dependency
and these browsers are specifically not that… these browsers are intended to do things like categorise tabs, complete forms, etc automatically without your interaction
of course they’ll ask before they do things they consider destructive, but what they consider destructive and what a malicious actor can use are very different things
some of that is certainly benign, but the point with prompt injection is that it can take benign things and make them plausibly malicious
imo anything firefox-based until servo or ladybird matures
i use waterfox, i know a lot of people use librewolf
remember that switching to anything chromium (like vivaldi, brave) still gives google power. on web standards at least, mozilla still fights for us (and is arguably the only one protecting us from shit like putting tracking stabdards directly into the web spec)
sometimes stores have sales that includes gift cards so you can get $500 of apple credit for 20% off
the vuln afaik is for remote code execution via basically a mechanism that’s kinda like a transparent RPC to the server (think like you just write frontend code with like a “getUsers” and it just automatically retrieves and deserializes the results so you can render the UI without worrying about how that data exists in the browser)
i’m not a front end engineer, and haven’t used react server components, but i am a principal software engineer, i do react for personal projects, and have written react professionally
i can’t think of a way it’d be exploitable via purely client-side means
i THINK what they mean is that you can use some of the RSC stuff without the RPC-style interfaces, and in that case they say the server component is still vulnerable, but you still need react things running on your server
a huge majority of react code is client-side only, with server-side code written in other languages/frameworks and interfaces with something like REST or GraphQL (or even RPC of course)
it looks like this only applies react server components, and it doesn’t look like element uses react server components
but i only had a quick skim; could be wrong, but personally i wouldn’t shut it down - not that im running a server myself
most things scale if you throw enough resources at them. we generally say that things don’t scale if the majority case doesn’t scale… it costs far fewer resources to scale with multiple repos that it does to scale a monorepo, thus monorepo doesn’t scale: i’d argue even the google case proves that… they’ve already sunk so much into dev tooling to make it work… it might be beneficial to the culture (in that they like engineers to work across the entire google codebase), but it’s not a decision made because it scales: scale is an impediment
or fixing windows by only using WSL and reading the arch wiki
that’s a good and bad thing though…
it’s easy to reference code, so it leads to tight coupling
it’s easy to reference code, so let’s pull this out into a separately testable, well-documented, reusable library
my main reason for ever using a monorepo is to separate out a bunch of shared libraries into real libraries, and still be able to have eg HMR
yeah they do certainly exist, but bog standard “red light cameras”… ie single purpose cameras are not that kind of problem… imo, as long as they’re deployed to combat actual issues they’re very much a beneficial tool
i think it’s important to differentiate these new kinds of cameras from the single purpose cameras so that arguments against them can be made independently