It’s not that they’re being critical, it’s that someone is being shady with some sort of motive. I don’t want the fediverse to get ruined with narrative attack bs, I want to talk to real humans who aren’t trying to manipulate me. If I was cool with that I’d just go back to Reddit.
what is your sources of info than? it better not be blogs, or another opinion article, because those arnt news either. you should do the due dilligence when looking at any news article, or article, verify the source and facts.
It’s not that they’re being critical, it’s that someone is being shady with some sort of motive. I don’t want the fediverse to get ruined with narrative attack bs, I want to talk to real humans who aren’t trying to manipulate me. If I was cool with that I’d just go back to Reddit.
I agree with you, but this is a link to a New York Times article, not some shady blog just made to push an agenda.
If people didn’t find this article interesting, they could just not upvote it.
NYT isn’t exactly much better than a shady blog. Like most media now.
what is your sources of info than? it better not be blogs, or another opinion article, because those arnt news either. you should do the due dilligence when looking at any news article, or article, verify the source and facts.
Okay but it’s still regarded as a serious publication, even if every publication has some kind of agenda
That’s cute but Lemmy has the same agenda pushing bots that Reddit has.