It very clearly is about the historical event I have linked above via the acutal wiki not your weird grokopedia thing.
And you’re also arguing off of that random authors book, the one that didn’t actually back up the claims being made. We’ve already been over how factually incorrect that was.
Likewise it was not a fascist uprising simply because it was democratic, /anti-authoritarian and wanted to escape from Soviet imperialism. Everything you don’t like isn’t Hitler.
Likewise it was not a fascist uprising simply because it was democratic, /anti-authoritarian and wanted to escape from Soviet imperialism.
This. My grandparents were there when the authorities opened fire on the peacefully gathering crowd. They only escaped with their lives because they got lucky, they saw some others fall around them.
I recommended reading the Wikipedia entry for the liberal POV, the Prolewiki entry for the Marxist point of view, and the Red Sails article by Nia Frome for a modern contextualization of how the term is used today from a Marxist POV. Prolewiki isn’t “grokopedia,” it has its sources listed clearly.
Secondly, the book I referenced, The Truth About Hungary by Herbert Aptheker, heavily relies on citing western sources like the New York Times (which you can see if you actually read my comment). Aptheker backs up his claims heavily.
It was a fascist uprising because the ones going through with the counter-revolution let Nazis captured during World War II out of jail, and were lynching Jewish people and communists. You can frame this as “pro-democracy” all you want, but this was factually documented. You’re correct about one thing, everything I don’t like isn’t Hitler, but the actual Nazis let out of jail were actual Nazis.
It very clearly is about the historical event I have linked above via the acutal wiki not your weird grokopedia thing.
And you’re also arguing off of that random authors book, the one that didn’t actually back up the claims being made. We’ve already been over how factually incorrect that was.
Likewise it was not a fascist uprising simply because it was democratic, /anti-authoritarian and wanted to escape from Soviet imperialism. Everything you don’t like isn’t Hitler.
This. My grandparents were there when the authorities opened fire on the peacefully gathering crowd. They only escaped with their lives because they got lucky, they saw some others fall around them.
Translation of the Hungarian wikipedia article bc it doesn’t seem to exist in other languages: https://hu-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Sortűz_a_Parlamentnél_1956-ban?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-GB
I recommended reading the Wikipedia entry for the liberal POV, the Prolewiki entry for the Marxist point of view, and the Red Sails article by Nia Frome for a modern contextualization of how the term is used today from a Marxist POV. Prolewiki isn’t “grokopedia,” it has its sources listed clearly.
Secondly, the book I referenced, The Truth About Hungary by Herbert Aptheker, heavily relies on citing western sources like the New York Times (which you can see if you actually read my comment). Aptheker backs up his claims heavily.
It was a fascist uprising because the ones going through with the counter-revolution let Nazis captured during World War II out of jail, and were lynching Jewish people and communists. You can frame this as “pro-democracy” all you want, but this was factually documented. You’re correct about one thing, everything I don’t like isn’t Hitler, but the actual Nazis let out of jail were actual Nazis.