hot off the presses 
in b4 leftist meme
You must log in or register to comment.
Where do we put the eastern capitalists? China, Russia, India, Brazil, ect?
This can only be a troll
It’s not exactly serious, I wouldn’t be using a silly meme template like this otherwise.
There is a difference between authority used against capital and authority used in favor of capital, something which is kind of swept under the rug in the original template.
It’s a bit ironic that I can’t even read the post asking for alt-text - instance is blocked on my end
I don’t know where I’d begin trying to transcribe this to text, but they seem to take ‘political science’ very seriously so they’d probably hate it if I did.
What are tankies doing in the bottom left?
positive Y axis is dictatorship of capital, negative Y axis is the gradient of proletarian dictatorship
if anything I put them too high on that
Well i guess if that’s your version of this then so be it
it’s not like the original version makes any more sense tbh.
if I was to redo it I would probably make the negative Y axis reflect degree of authority used against bourgeois elements, because the positive Y is reflecting authority used by the bourgeois
Your version is a left-focused/biased interpretation. The dictatorship of capital is not the only thing that makes a state authoritarian IMO.
Going by your classifications, the DPRK isn’t authoritarian, and that’s a ridiculous premise unless you’re a tankie.
the original compass meme is ridiculous, I chose to highlight who is pro dictatorship of capital and not doing anything to fundamentally change it, ie the top right quadrant.
say what you like about the DPRK, but they are outside of that region on those terms
Like i said if that’s how you want to do it, who am i to argue with you?
You’ve set the terms, and your classifications are internally consistent. All I’m highlighting is that it’s left-biased and therefore not objective
Things can have a bias and still be objective, and the original one is not unbiased either, it smuggles in all sorts of assumptions.
The fact that it has an entire quadrant for ancap make-believe should be all the indication you need that the whole thing has a right wing bias.
Everyone has bias, that doesn’t mean that Diva’s analysis isn’t objective.
What happened to the other two quadrants?
Left those blank on purpose; IMO most people ideologically committed to being in those quadrants actually belong in the top right somewhere
But you’ve got people who are normally in the auth-left quadrant in the lib-left one. This confuses me.
Authority means different things, depending on the context. Frankly the original political compass made absolutely no sense in how it defined things, hence having an entire quadrant for ancap make-believe.
In this, positive Y axis corresponds with using authority in favor of bourgeois interests, negative Y axis corresponds with using authority in opposition to bourgeois interests.
Well your labels are inaccurate in that case. And those axes are not particularly independent from one another.
While I personally agree that the traditional political compass is a flawed and subjective view of the diversity of political views, it does a fairly good job of quantifying some differences that exist within the left and right that often confuse people otherwise. And it does seem to adequately categorize the vast majority of people in the west, even if imperfectly. So I don’t really get all the hate.
the main problem with the political compass is it was created by and for authoritarian capitalists to normalize the lie that as people grow older they get more conservative. there’s far more axes than just two
Gotta agree, it’s just a caricature of everything outside that range for the most part. Adding Z axis starts to just make it confusing too
the real political spectrum i think has about 14 axes
Needs text alternative.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:
- usability
- we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
- text search is unavailable
- the system can’t
- reflow text to varied screen sizes
- vary presentation (size, contrast)
- vary modality (audio, braille)
- accessibility
- lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
- some users can’t read this due to lack of alt text
- users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
- systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices
- searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
- fault tolerance: no text fallback if
- image breaks
- image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.
Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
another case of willful ignorance of meanings of words & political science
not providing alt text is right wing
What’s your deal man?
What’s yours?
- usability
