What a bunch of trend chasers: many of us were doing that before AI. Posers.

I get that, but don’t you get satisfaction raising inconvenient facts with rage addicts to lift their irrational outrage beyond orbit?

What’s yours?

another case of willful ignorance of meanings of words & political science

not providing alt text is right wing

Everyone eventually dies.

image of longass text

If the world seems unreal & you feel like you’re watching yourself play a role in a movie rather than living your life, then that might be a psychiatric disorder worth evaluation by a professional. It’s normal on occasions, but not beyond that it interferes with your regular ability to function.

Legally there isn’t and it’s everyone’s fundamental right to criticize & ridicule you even to your face. In a free society, we argue with words, not force or violence.

That’s the general discourse in this community: ignoramuses flush logic down the shitter.

no laws or caselaw cited

invalid opinion discarded

She could have at least asked him to stop before destroying property.

Stop what? Wouldn’t there be a video of her breaking them if they were recording?

Instagram had recommended 1.4 million potentially inappropriate adults to teenagers in a single day in 2022

What does that even mean?

That all still seems like catastrophizing over videos, images, text on a screen that can’t compel action or credible harm. I expect that lawsuit to go nowhere.

maybe [email protected] or [email protected]

As the US Congressional commission on similar laws reported decades ago

• age verification is ineffective with highly adverse impacts
• client-side filtering^[1] is more effective with less adverse impacts.

Those conclusions still hold today.

What I got is the EU is made up of 2 legislative chambers

• council of EU: heads of member states
• parliament: directly elected

and an executive European Commission consisting of a commissioner for each state & who are nominated by the council of the EU. The executive proposes/drafts laws for the legislative chambers to approve/reject/amend or request new drafts.

The commission (dickheads who aren’t directly elected) drafted the proposal. The council (head of state dickheads) adopted the draft without the support of key members. Parliament (the directly elected) has strongly organized for a less Orwellian alternative that opposes the draft. A commissioner voiced their support for parliament’s alternative & offered to extend time for negotiations.

Create a new community [email protected], post it there, then ban yourself. We don’t need to stop there: create a community [email protected] for every proportion x from 0 to 1. Great justice will be had.

Due to a proposition of the philosophy: the sanctity of private property rights.

Was answered with

What do we call a philosophy that accepts the core propositions without the elements you object to? Liberal: your objected elements aren’t essential to the philosophy.

and counterexample of liberal socialism.

And no, there is no private property under socialism, you’re thinking of personal property.

Contradiction: personal property is private, ie, owned by non-governmental entities per conventional definition. I already wrote about “personal property” & "means of production”.

Owning certain items is illegal even in the US^[1], yet people have private property rights. Prohibiting ownership of some things doesn’t prohibit the right to have property.

fucking Proudhon

Don’t know, not critical to the argument. The fact remains the core propositions of liberalism & socialism can be combined without conflict, and liberalism isn’t an economic philosophy.

You never stated your disagreement with the core propositions I had identified.

China at least is fucking big

That doesn’t explain the other communist states or excuse the failure to meet the main outcome & whole reason for existing. All countries have developed & underdeveloped regions. Same excuse would apply to liberal democracies with lower economic inequality, yet they don’t need it.

social democracy in Scandinavia is currently being peeled off by the far right

Again

The actions of governments don’t necessarily follow from a philosophy they may fail to track.

Lapses from a philosophy don’t inform us about the propositions of that philosophy. Are liberalism & socialism consistent together? Philosophies combining both exist.

Could you point out which of the core propositions I identified are incompatible with socialism?

Suck my battery, beep boop.

A bot wouldn’t fuckup markdown: bot harder?

Nah, straw man & bait.