• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It seems to be popular with people i talk to in real life. It also seems go be very popular with leftwing people outside niche internet spaces like this. Most people are viewing this as a good way to prevent misinformation brainwashing and not paying attention to the removal of internet freedom. From talking to these people its because they dont think there is internet freedom as internet is only 5 sites which all spy on you already.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most people are viewing this as a good way to prevent misinformation brainwashing

      If only the government had actually made that the law. Crack down on the harmful algorithms that commercial social media use, instead of this shit.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well that would be a much bigger line to cross. Its reasonable to say under 16s are to young to navigate the world of online info. But its completely different to say no age can go on the internet.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          no age can go on the internet.

          I don’t think anyone had ever suggested anything like that.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You’re right. I have no idea how I read your initial comment and jump to that conclusion. I must have been tired when i replied.

            For the actual response. I think this law does partial combat the misinformation,advertising and brainwashing concerns. I dont think we can/need to prevent misinformation, advertising or brainwashing for people over 16 without serious infringement on civil liberties.

            For algorithm’s its far less feasible to go after. These companies protect the algorithm because its the core IP of their business. Its not something we can simply get rid of without destroying the most popular feature of the platform.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The fact is, right now we know that Facebook has at times made a deliberate, conscious choice to leave in aspects of their algorithm that were causing harm. Their own studies have shown this. Making that practice illegal—knowingly causing harm with your algorithm—would be a good place to start with regulation.