• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I don’t engage with the community at all. I don’t buy games on Epic because their launcher is ass. And last I checked they don’t even have reviews for games. They don’t require disclaimers for anti-consumer measures either like Valve does for 3rd party accounts, Denuvo, etc. and they even had the balls to criticize Valve’s requirements for AI disclosure.

    The fact that their CEO is openly anti-Linux is another good reason.

    They just come off to me like a very anti-consumer company, like most all other corporations.

    • GreyCat@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      If you have ever used the steam workshop, read discussions, guides or news. You have benefitted from the steam community.
      And reviews are also part of the steam community.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The reviews are a part of the community, even if they’re not found in the “Community” part of Steam.

      But yeah, EGS has many failings, pretty much all of which were pointed out right at the start. They weren’t improved upon because Epic don’t want to deliver the best possible experience or promote the capability of the PC as a gaming platform. They just want you to buy digital shit, get bored of it, and then buy more digital shit at the lowest possible cost to them. Effort costs money so they won’t make any.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Effort costs money so they won’t make any.

        Well, at least in Tim Sweeney’s twisted mind that’s how it works. In reality, spending $100,000 to have a developer actually support the year would do way more to get long term customers on the store while coating a pittance jn comparison to how much EGS spent on exclusivity deals.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Steam is the only platform I can think of where I actually still trust the review

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        20 hours ago

        When they first launched, their whole main message was “it’s a cheaper cut for the devs!” Perhaps I’m being selfish, but that’s not a message that resonates to me as a buyer.

        Hint: most of us don’t get hot and bothered about exactly how much margin Walmart lets Tyson take on their chicken nuggets, so trying to apply that message to games is weird.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you look at steam reviews (text or even just ratings), you do kind of engage with the community!

      Steam is very “community-focused” in that regard as opposed to the top-down corporate “buy what I’m selling, trust us it’s good”. Posting two review scores (recent and all-time) is not something most stores, games or not, will do

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      EGS isn’t really even a store, it’s sole purpose is to avoid giving anyone else a cut of fortnite.