• Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    That’s such a bad way to look at it. I would’ve bought a 5090 if I could afford it because I want to hold onto the 5090 for almost a decade like I did with my 1080. Depending on prices, it doesn’t make sense to upgrade twice in 10 years because you bought a budget option, and then be stuck trying to sell a budget card. 5090s will hold their value for years to come. Good luck playing AAA titles maxed out in 5 years on a 7800XT.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Generally, you’ll get better results by spending half as much on GPUs twice as often. Games generally aren’t made expecting all their players to have a current-gen top-of-the-line card, so you don’t benefit much from having a top-of-the-line card at first, and then a couple of generations later, usually there’s a card that outperforms the previous top-of-the-line card that costs half as much as it did, so you end up with a better card in the long run.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Good luck playing AAA titles maxed out in 5 years on a 5080 too… 5090 isn’t even considered a consumer card anyway, it’s more like an enthusiast, collector’s item. It’s so expensive compared to its performance value.

      You have to look at performance-to-price ratio. That’s the only metric that matters, and should determine how much you can sell it for when upgrading, and how often you upgrade.