After seeing a megathread praising Mao Zedong, an actual mass killer, and a post about a guy saying “99% of westerners are 100000000000% sure they know what happened in ‘Tiny Man Square’ […] the reasons for this are complex and involve propaganda […],” I am genuinely curious what leads people to this belief system. Even if propaganda is involved when it comes to Tiananmen Square, it doesn’t change the atrocities that were/are committed everywhere else in China.

I am all for letting people believe what they want but I am lost on why one would deliberately praise any authoritarian system this hard.

Can someone please help me understand why this is such a large and prominent community? How have these ideals garnered such a following outside of China?

  • robotElder2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What is meant by “tankie” if not ML communist? And what other ideology would OP, who posted this from anarchist nexus to an anarchism community, propose i hold instead if not anarchism?

    • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The topic isn’t a comparison between the two and the fact you needed to bring it up is pretty funny.

      • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s an anarchist complaining about “tankies” and parroting NATO propaganda, it is absolutely a comparison between the two.

      • robotElder2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Of course there is implied comparison. If one doesn’t “fall into the tankie mindset” they must necessarily believe in something else. And if nothing else is equal to the task before us, which I assert to be the case, one must be either a tankie or resigned to extinction. I presumed based on OPs choice of instance and comm that the something else they believe and implicitly compare to “tankieism” is anarchism. OP asked why someone would be a tankie and I told them why I am a tankie rather than what they seem to be.

        • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Exactly what i was talking about teams: "if you don’t agree with us you must be < insert whatever is perceived as the current enemy >

          • robotElder2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I consider anarchists misguided, not my enemy. My enemy is the bourgeoisie and not because they disagree with me but because they exploit me, my peers, and the environment. Do you never argue with people who aren’t your enemy?

    • stinky@anarchist.nexusOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t propose you hold any ideology, I’m just curious as to why people choose this one