• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I remember that was the case for PS3 and BluRay, but not so much DVD and the PS2. PS3 was, what, $300? $400? Where as the cheapest BluRay player that just played BluRay movies was almost a grand.

    I may just not remember it being similar for PS2. I was a sophmore in high school when it came out.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That was absolutely true for ps2 and DVD. They were trying to recapture it with ps3 and blu ray and with less success.

    • rljkeimig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The PS3 was stupid expensive at launch, like $600 in 2006, nearly $1000 in 2026 dollars. But yeah I think that argument was made then also.

      I think the PS2 was marketed specifically for DVD capabilities in some cases, I remember an IR dongle and remote control they sold so you didn’t have to use a controller.