• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The assumption that the American legal, political, and cultural context is the “default.” They say “X is illegal” without specifying jurisdiction. They assume a “right wing” or “left wing” party must be like their Republicans or Democrats. And so forth.

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s funny hearing Americans say they hate liberals, and me being able to agree except meaning the exact opposite. Liberal party is right wing for me lol

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        …cue the argument about what liberal, libertarian, and liberalism really mean. Hell, Americans even (re)define terms to suit their pov, like adding “social liberalism” to make it clear that their definition is correcct. Or my favorite, “Larger Middle East”.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, this is also very noticeable in media. They can have some kind of aliens in a future sci-fi universe that somehow have a legal process and trial that exactly mirrors the American way of doing things. For Americans that’s just normal, not realising this is absolutely not the norm in the rest of the world. Same thing with malls, hospitals, roads and many more things.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        And unfortunately due to the prevalence of American media it “leaks” into other cultures as well. I’m Canadian and it’s not uncommon to hear about people being arrested or whatever and claiming that their “first amendment” rights were being violated, or “taking the fifth” (ie, the fifth amendment’s right to remain silent). We actually do have somewhat analogous laws for those things but of course they only know about the American ones and often get the details wrong as a result.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          It was placed in the US to get the US to stay as a member. None of the big and powerful countries care for UN all that much but them leaving could’ve just been another League of Nations fiasco. Or that was the thinking behind it, iirc.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            And now I expect we’ll see another League of Nations fiasco soon, Trump has already denied visas to world leaders that he doesn’t like so that they theoretically can’t come to the UN. The treaty the US signed regarding the UN means they don’t need visas for that, but we all know how Trump loves to follow agreements.

            Maybe the UN can survive in some form by relocating, IIRC they do have a secondary office in Geneva already.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh how I love these messages about American companies doing illegal stuff and think they can get away with it just because it isn’t illegal in the US, only for the government to come down hard on them.

      Even more funny if they have to leave Europe afterwards.

      Sorry you can’t bust unions over here.