Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down12
arrow-up1397arrow-down1imageThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 day agoThis is not a defense of the fascists, but calling it a “sprint” up to her car is as disingenuous as saying the officer was “run over”.
minus-squareruuster13@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 hours agoHe trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·12 hours agoIt was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.
This is not a defense of the fascists, but calling it a “sprint” up to her car is as disingenuous as saying the officer was “run over”.
He trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
It was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.