I think that this would be great, since source code auditing would provide insight into anti-consumer additions like malicious backdoors, hidden spyware capabilities, unintended vulnerabilities, etc. However, this could be very bad if this passes and then escalates to mandatory source code modification at the request of a sovereign state. As always, there are possible pros and cons to this approach.

  • PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    India proposes requiring smartphone makers to share source code with the government and make several software changes as part of a raft of security measures.

    How does that sound promising at all? Especially when initiated by a government, previously having attempted to enforce government spyware, to be installed on all consumer smartphones. The following excerpts are from India’s proposed phone security rules that are worrying tech firms

    Devices must store security audit logs, including app installations and login attempts, for 12 months.

    Phones must periodically scan for malware and identify potentially harmful applications.

    Defined to be potentially harmful by who? Right.

    Phone makers must notify a government organisation before releasing any major updates or security patches.

    We cannot approve of the security patch just yet, as we must first extensively exploit the vulnerability…

    Devices must detect if phones have been rooted or “jailbroken”, where users bypass built-in security restrictions, and display continuous warning banners to recommend corrective measures.

    Phones must permanently block installation of older software versions, even if officially signed by the manufacturer, to prevent security downgrades.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    India proposes requiring smartphone makers to share source code with the government

    Before anyone gets their hopes up that India is pushing for open source software.

  • icerunner_origin@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmm, doubt it’s for security. Seems more likely they’re looking for backdoors in order to spy on users. There are far too many governments desperate to backdoor encryption and messaging apps to trust any government’s stated intent when it comes to technology

  • evol@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Whats even the point theirs plenty of engineers in the country with source code access? Maybe the Chinese ones don’t hire in India so its aimed towards them.

    I want a government thats requires mandatory AGPL for most classes of software.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    lol good luck. Apple already told you to pound sand when you demanded to install state run apps, and now you think you’re getting the source code?