• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    the sad thing is we should be excited to replace human beings doing monotonous work but we all know how that will go with capitalists running things.

    • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would be exciting if all of our lives were going to be easier rather than an increase in homelessness.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That might not be what we should be excited to do.

      And what people are excited is the idea of replacing all non-pleasant work.

      So here’s the catch, replacing human work with machines where practical usually leaves the parts where humans are needed for being human, not for their output as a part of a mechanism.

      For example, humans greeting you at a hotel, humans carrying trays and accepting orders in restaurants, humans as a decoration, humans doing prostitution, human gladiators, human actors. OK, the last part is fine.

      All these involve learning and maintaining skills more removed from power than skills of more industrial professions (monotonous work).

      Being a nice monkey to those who can afford you as a servant might not be what most people dream about.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        my point is what we “should be” excited about is being released from monotonous work in exchange for universal basic income, so we wouldn’t feel the need to be reduced to servants. obviously that isn’t going to happen, but that’s the utopian dream.