• NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        No. There is no valid reason to use it. All this does is continue to enable a massive AI data center and Zuckerbergs billions. Walking away is the only viable option. It needs to go away, stop helping it remain.

        Edit: Why would any one argue with this? Unless you are a billionaire, use of this shit is hurting you. Your environment, AI slop, your politics for fucks sake. Continued use is making your life worse for the sake of a handful of people enriching themselves from it, and you don’t care?

  • airikr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just don’t get a court order by Meta like the other dude that created a front-end for Instagram. Can’t remember the name since it was before the pandemic. There was a lot of news about it in the FOSS community.

  • hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    awesome! i hope this stays around.

    would be nice if it also saved/archived everything it downloads from instagram and sends it to the internet archive

  • kumi@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Cool! Keeping up with platform changes is a challenge for projects like this. I think to be successful beyond initial popularity you need an active community that can do this together. It’s draining for just one person - especially once you get big enough that they might actively break things just to mess with your integration. Following maintenance of alternative YouTube clients as well as searx-ng is illustrative.

    Not to discourage but be prepared. Best of luck!

    https://cadence.moe/blog/2022-09-01-discontinuing-bibliogram

    • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve already read that article, the situation on Instagram has changed a bit, which makes scraping easier.

      Ratelimits are still a problem if you don’t have a residential IP, but I have a workaround for that (which I’m hesitant to share publicly).

        • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You are right. According to the definition of social media, Lemmy is social media. However, “social media” would by definition fit any kind of digital communication media. A forum, or a blog, or an IRC channel are also, by definition, social media.

          I would argue that the social media has a distinct association with Facebook, Instagram and the diverse spawns of those, and by association doesn’t fit anything else. At best, we simply lack a different term, which splits “old-school” stuff like forums and blogs. I view lemmy more like a forum. You have categories, and users can go into categories to start discussions. You don’t follow anyone. People also don’t create and post their own content, but rather seek discussions or share other stuff from the internet. Your goal is not reach, follow count or like count.

          It is social media, but it’s definitely nothing like Facebook. We simply lack a better term.

          • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I would definitely call a forum or IRC channel social media.

            I wouldn’t consider blogs social media unless they had a very active comments section.

          • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            What would you define social media as?

            Oxford says.

            websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.

            That definition certainly matches Lemmy.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Social networking is about connecting people, which Lemmy as a forum does. You could argue that the function of Lemmy as a link aggregator is more social media like, but I doubt people would consider an RSS feed reader to be social media either.

              Social media is like TV, a one-to-many medium, usually with some sort of feed curation to promote certain topics.

              • Waryle@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                That’s a totally made up definition from your part. Media is the plural of medium, which means “intermediary”. A social media is just the middleman that allows people to socialize. Lemmy is a social media, as well as a social network.

                • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Every definition is “made up” 🙄

                  What I explained is how these terms are commonly used on the fediverse.

                  And anyways, if “social media” and “social network” is the same, why have two different terms for it?