This is some not great news. I’ve been using NI (as well as izotope & plugin alliance) stuff for a very long time, and have hardware from them too. I imagine there are a lot of small sound design studios selling kontakt instruments who are a bit scared for the future now.

I really hope they’re able to find a good solution for creators with the administrators.

Edit:

MusicRadar article: https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/native-instruments-has-been-placed-in-preliminary-insolvency

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’m sorry for all the people who will be inconvenienced by this, but personally I hope this may have a positive outcome by hopefully ending the stranglehold NI has on sound font libraries (kontact), and increase adoption of open-source alternatives (SFZ).

    NI was abusing their position as a virtual monopoly on soundfonts.

    • 9point6@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Firstly, I 100% completely agree that it would be good to have everyone move to an open alternative, but it simply doesn’t practically exist yet. SFZ is as you describe, just a sound font, Kontakt is effectively a DAW in itself with how complex the instruments can get.

      I could be wrong but I’ve read a number of times that a big part of its dominance is the development experience of kontakt keeping sound designers using it.

      The dev tooling, licensing infrastructure and high standard of built-in effects and building blocks, etc are apparently more or less peerless even across other proprietary solutions. Professional sound designers ultimately want to build and sell their instruments, so any friction there is going to make them look elsewhere

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        That may be the case, but it seems to come down to the same chicken & the egg problem that most proprietary vs. free software has had to overcome. Proprietary software usually can offer a smoother UX because there isn’t enough development of the FLOSS alternative, which is caused by a lack of users (and thus the potential pool of developers and financial donors) to motivate that UX becoming more polished.

        For most, the lock-in of proprietary software was tolerable because it was at worst an inconvenience at times, or only incurred a semi-reasonable cost. But we’re seeing that as investors demand enshittification, staying in those comfortable lock-ins will inevitably result in further pain down the road as the user is squeezed further and further with more invasive DRM restrictions, more features being locked behind paywalls, and intolerable subscriptions with ever increasing monthly dues.

        At some point people will need to choose between continuing the use of lock-in software for continued comfort in the short term, or biting the bullet and developing/using the less comfortable FLOSS option to encourage it to become comfortable by dog-fooding it. We can see when that finally happens, it is able to out compete the lock-in options to the benefit of us all (Blender, Godot, and Krita are good examples).

        But that’s just my 2 cents.

    • 9point6@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be great, but also not something I see happening off the back of this, an administrator needs to get debts paid, and that’s only going to happen by selling the company or splitting it up and selling the parts.

      Conglomerates like InMusic are probably salivating

    • 9point6@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep

      They all merged a couple of years ago, I think also partly because of financial issues IIRC

      I’d hoped they had got through the other side of that

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hell, iZotope was the standard for so many years. I use RX on my field recording to clean them up before making them into samples a lot of times.

        Private equity kills everything, I swear. It doesn’t help that UA went native mostly and Waves prices so aggressively, Arturia and Akai are innovating, and Spitfire and OT cut Kontakt out of the loop. However, I’m fucking sure it’s like 90% on Francisco Partners getting rid of the support teams for outsourcing, deleting the highest paid engineers, stopped fixing bugs, and whatever the fuck they were doing with Soundwide instead of doing things for customers.