That’s the neo-liberal for you. When progress is on the rise, they coddle up with fascism to keep it down. Madani is a perfect example. The Democrat establishment did all it legally could to stop him winning, they’d rather have had the right win than someone actually on the left promising meaningful change. Very telling.
You mean letting the poor carry…the nobles still could and had bodyguards that carried as well.
Anti-2a people lick the same boot as the maga chodes…
That’s the neo-liberal for you. When progress is on the rise, they coddle up with fascism to keep it down. Madani is a perfect example. The Democrat establishment did all it legally could to stop him winning, they’d rather have had the right win than someone actually on the left promising meaningful change. Very telling.
It happened yes, but the law was for no one to and roman republic politics ran smoothest when it was enforced.
No that was the norm. Nobles and high class people had arms and the poor and working class was unarmed. It was that way to keep them from revolting
Damn with a claim like that you’ve got a primary source right there don’t you?
Good to know you’re not armed.