• Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Look… Im sure this is not the first time the pope has been called the antichrist. It likely happened in 884, 964, 997, 1012, 1378, 1409, or 1418 to just name a few.

      (This is not be taken seriously, I grabbed a bunch of years from the Wikipedia list of antipoes to make a point when the role was contested. In the case of the ones between 1378-1418, where a bloody mess is an understatement (I would rather read history on the war of the roses), there have been significantly fewer violent disagreements regarding the title/position since then)

    • shithawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “I’m definitely not the antichrist, so much so I go around holding events to discuss the antichrist and how I am not him.” The lack of self reflection or perhaps just plain evil is astounding

    • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well yeah, the pope is Antichrist.

      The whole assassination of Jesus was an inside job orchestrated be Peter to become the first pope and lead the flock astray right in the hands of the devil!