I’m about to play Back 4 Blood, the “spiritual successor” to Left 4 Dead.

This game has mixed reviews. And based on comments, it looks like the online co-op and PvP is dead.

Now whenever I see blowback on games like this, I wonder if it’s because Back 4 Blood is simply not exactly like Left 4 Dead even though it was made by the same developers. It’s what I like to call the Yooka-Laylee Phenomenon.

Or is this more like the Mighty No. 9 Phenomenon where, it’s not so much the spiritual successor isn’t exactly like the original, but nowhere near as good as the original?

Hard to say without playing.

I do notice that, for whatever reason, Steam reviewers tend to privilege indie releases over AAA titles. So that might be something to do with it too.

I don’t know. This is all conjecture from someone who’s yet to play it yet. However, last Steam sale, I bought this for C$3.99 – which was 95% off. So how bad can it really be?

Well, you know what they say – YOLO!

@[email protected]

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I played it when it first came out and found it to be a solid, meh.

    It was serviceable, enjoyable in short bursts with friends but the devs just keep nerfing everything, every weapon, every build that was good until it basically lost all the fun for me.