• Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      “There’s kind of a lot of people leaving X lately. How do you intend to reinvigorate the user base?”

      ‘this calls for a price increase’

  • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Kek. “adjusting” the prices to support the experience it offers. What experiences you dumbfuck.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    So if you add 10 million more bots @ $22/a month that’s a lot of money laundering.

    • 46_and_2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      This seems like the most likely intended consequence to me. They probably know their userbase well, and actual humans declining aren’t gonna be swayed to stay by a price hike. Those bots, on the other hand…

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Premium X is sparkling diarrhea, only produced by the finest assholes on the internet.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I feel like the people who pay for Twitter are probably dumb enough to pay whatever price the muskrat wants, so why not make it $200 a month?

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Then there’s me.

      “Twitter had a premium service??? What the hell would it even do??? I thought they abandoned the blue check mark thing.”

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Oh Elon, are you planning on doing the TikTok treatment on Bluesky next?