The world can no longer trust American tech. If that sounds dramatic, take a step back and consider the facts. The United States is a nation in the thrall of authoritarianism, owned and operated almost completely by a far-right doomsday cult intent on betraying every alliance, every contract, every promise
  • kokolores@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    81·
    10 hours ago

    I’m also trying to avoid as much American tech as possible.

    • Vivaldi/qwant instead of Firefox/Google
    • Proton instead of gmail
    • Waiting for WERO impatiently until then virtual card from wise instead of PayPal
    • Void Linux instead of windows/macOS
    • Surfshark for VPN

    Can’t change everything though. I have a company phone. I could get an extra private phone, but I’d still need to use the company phone for company related stuff. Same is true for the company laptop, but I do have my own computer.

    It’s not perfect, but the important thing to me is trying as best as I can.

    • madame_gaymes@programming.devEnglish
      2·
      2 hours ago
      • Chromium forks are troublesome. I’d suggest Mullvad Browser or LibreWolf instead.
      • Qwant is nice, but SearXNG aggregates qwant together with several other engines. Then there’s a new up-and-comer called Mwmbl.
      • Proton is yet another ecosystem that pretends to be for privacy while actually doing the opposite. Instead, Tuta or Mailbox (only downside to mailbox is no free accounts).
      • No comment on payment systems, I don’t trust any of them except maybe a local Credit Union.
      • Practically any Linux, don’t limit suggestions to one distro when there are many with varied support and out-of-the-box options.
      • Mullvad VPN + Mullvad Browser were made for each other, browser being co-developed with Tor Project, and is the highest rated in terms of defeating browser fingerprinting (even over Tor), and they have pioneered DAITA. I see many, many mixed thoughts on Surfshark. It is mainly a cheap and better alternative to Nord or Proton, but Mullvad is only $5/mo and you get so much more.

      None of the above are USA-based apart from Mwmbl, but it is non-profit and wholly FOSS.

      Test your browser fingerprints:

      • kokolores@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        1·
        1 hour ago

        I listed the stuff I use and what I changed. There’s also a reason why I chose this specific Linux distro as I try to avoid as much as I can with the jurisdiction in the US, which means a lot of Linux distros are not an option anymore.

        But that does not mean everyone needs to do the same. Do whatever you think is best.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.devEnglish
          2·
          55 minutes ago

          jurisdiction in the US, which means a lot of Linux distros are not an option anymore.

          Please elaborate and provide some receipts to what you mean.

          I know your list is what you use, my list is more data for you to DYOR and find even better, privacy respecting alternatives than what you suggested. As you say, do whatever you think is best.

          • kokolores@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
            2·
            42 minutes ago

            Just a couple of examples

            Red Hat Developed by a U.S.-based company.

            Fedora A community-driven project sponsored by Red Hat.

            Debian Originally founded in the U.S., with some legal ties to US regulations.

            Slackware developed by Patrick Volkerding in the US

            Since these distributions are developed or registered in the United States, they are subject to US laws, regulations, and export restrictions.

            When I have a look at what’s happening right now in the US I’m not sure what kind of laws will suddenly appear which might affect privacy and security of any kind of software from there. That’s why I decided to avoid them as much as possible.

            I will certainly go through your suggestions and have a look if I should change stuff (apart from proton, I’m sure about changing this one).

            • madame_gaymes@programming.devEnglish
              1·
              19 minutes ago

              Just because something is developed in the USA does not mean it will follow authoritarianism. These projects are open source, and many USA based open source projects are fighting back against this stuff. Besides, the internet is the internet, and these open source projects will live on beyond any USA law. This is the very point of the licensing. Having said that, I do agree with you on the RHEL/Fedora side of things.

              I’m not sure about the Debian legal ties, I’ll have to look further into that since you didn’t give me anything to reference. Still, the key point here is open source, which means you can review the source code and security experts will, too. Signal is also a USA based company; France and Sweden are trying to force backdoors on them, yet Signal has vehemently said, “No. Fuck Off.” So, clearly it’s not just the USA doing shitty things.

              I get that the current political situation in this shithole country is absolutely horrifying, but that does not immediately mean that the entire population of the country is with the fascists by default. Starlink being used for election purpose should be the number one red flag indicator that the citizens of the USA did not actually vote for what’s happening and it was manipulated. Because of the fascist playbook and money, it is difficult for the proletariat to do much without seriously violent actions.

              I just don’t agree with your sentiment on this US jurisdiction idea when it comes to open source, non-profit projects. And to be clear, it’s OK that we might disagree. I’m just providing discourse with a healthy dose of skepticism.

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      31·
      6 hours ago

      Im trying to find a replacement for Proton, as the new CEO likes trump and seems pretty far right…

      I am afraid that they will start enshitification soon

        • Photuris@lemmy.ml
          1·
          4 hours ago

          Do y’all know how Fastmail measures up in regards to privacy?

          I’m happy with the service, but I don’t know how it compares in this particular domain, compared to the likes of Proton, Tuta, et al.

          • kokolores@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
            2·
            4 hours ago

            Fastmail: Privacy & Security Overview

            +Encrypted storage & transit (TLS 1.3, Perfect Forward Secrecy).

            +No ads, no data selling – user-funded.

            +2FA & Passkey support for added security.

            -Based in Australia – subject to laws like the Assistance and Access Act (2018).

            -No built-in end-to-end encryption (E2EE) – requires third-party PGP/S/MIME.

            https://www.fastmail.com/features/security

            https://www.fastmail.com/policies/privacy

            Good for privacy, but jurisdiction risks & lack of E2EE make alternatives like tuta (or proton) a better choice.