yes its from reddit, but its fairly interesting.
https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1hwj0sq/fired_from_meta_after_1_week_prolog_engineer/
yes its from reddit, but its fairly interesting.
https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1hwj0sq/fired_from_meta_after_1_week_prolog_engineer/
It’s a high quality question, yes.
The close as already answered elsewhere is valid though. It’s not saying that the question is wrong; at least a decade ago StackOverflow explicitly allowed and encouraged asking the same question in different ways so they and their answers can be found.
It’s about operator precedence. And the referenced question asks the same thing, about
??
and a comparison operator.The head note says:
Notably, it refers to answers, not the invalidity or duplication of a question.
The header also mentions [previously] opinion based, so I looked into the question edit history. It most certainly was not a “high quality” question at the beginning - at the very least to the degree it looks like now.
I think it’s too much to close a question just because a different question happen to have the same answer. There might be a future answer that might apply to one, but not the other.
Do you think that applies to this question?
Null coalesce operator vs comparison operator precedence? Both questions are about that. I don’t see one having a different answer to the other. In that case, duplication would only lead to spread out partially outdated information, instead of one place being updated.
Then it should be closed for being a duplicate question. I don’t think it makes sense to close any question for having a duplicate answer.