I don’t think this author has any idea what she’s talking about. The italic paragraph near the top attempts to justify her ignorance, but she’s very clearly drinking the AI CEO Kool-Aid. AGI is not a stop down the road that LLMs are taking us on, it’s a hypothetical destination that we don’t even know if we’re driving toward. We can’t even define what causes consciousness yet, so there’s no way for us to model it digitally. It will happen eventually, but even the non-PR quotes in the article are hedging based on rough estimates and general trends. It’s totally possible that we go another century before true AGI, and that’s ignoring the real potential for big losses in scientific progress given current political happenings.
I don’t think this author has any idea what she’s talking about. The italic paragraph near the top attempts to justify her ignorance, but she’s very clearly drinking the AI CEO Kool-Aid. AGI is not a stop down the road that LLMs are taking us on, it’s a hypothetical destination that we don’t even know if we’re driving toward. We can’t even define what causes consciousness yet, so there’s no way for us to model it digitally. It will happen eventually, but even the non-PR quotes in the article are hedging based on rough estimates and general trends. It’s totally possible that we go another century before true AGI, and that’s ignoring the real potential for big losses in scientific progress given current political happenings.
Oh, she’s still on that? Yep, that’s soooo 2023. I’ll probably just skip this one.