GIMP and I have never gotten on well. I’d tried it many times over the years, but it always felt sort’ve off. Unpleasant, even. Things got better when the Single Window Mode came out years ago, but still, I would choose something else to edit images if I could, which usually ended up being Krita, even if it was forcing it into a role it wasn’t originally intended for.

With the release of GIMP 3, I was hopeful things would be better and maybe even have its Blender 2.8 glow-up moment.

3.0 on its own, while nice (and setting the stage for more rapid improvement), didn’t turn out to be the revolution I was mildly hoping it would be.

But I’d heard of an outside attempt to improve the UI called PhotoGIMP, and was pleased to find that it’d already been updated for GIMP 3.0. Installation was as simple as could be. And by Jove, it really does what it says on the tin.

For the first time, using GIMP felt good. When you get right down to it it’s not a monumental change, just a reorganization of windows and some better shortcuts, but damn if it isn’t just what the doctor ordered.

This positive experience warranted further investigation of the merits of GIMP, and if it could be pushed further with community efforts. That’s when I discovered Resynthesizer, a plugin that replicates most of the functionality of Photoshop’s Context Aware Fill.

That installed even easier thanks to being available as a flatpak, and after quickly learning how to use it, I was off to races, content filling all of the areas to my heart’s content (and I assure you, it was thoroughly contented, and I haven’t even tried G’Mic yet!)

In all seriousness, GIMP with these modifications was a revelation for me on how good GIMP can actually be when you spend a minute giving it a bit of polish. If you’d written it off in the past as I did, I hope this post encourages you to follow in my footsteps and give it another go as well. You might find that you can get along with it after all.

  • derbis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Note that Resynthesizer doesn’t replicate a Photoshop feature, it’s the other way around. Resynth came out on 2003. CAF started off as a clone of it.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Woah! Had no idea. Considering that, I’m amazed this ability for GIMP isn’t more well known (or maybe it is, and I’m just unusually late hearing about 😅)

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Resynthesizer, a plugin that replicates most of the functionality of Photoshop’s Context Aware Fill.

    It’s a real shame that gems like that don’t even have screenshots on the project page! Nice find. Looks really nice!

  • renard_roux@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In curious — what’s your user level in Photoshop? Tried GIMP a few times, and loathed it, as a professional (and very proficient) Photoshop user.

    I also loathe Adobe*, but i’m stuck with them (and macOS) until someone comes up with a viable alternative 😓

    Managed to get somewhat comfortable with Linux (Fedora+KDE Plasma) on an old Chromebook recently, so think I might be ready to leave macOS behind, if only there was a viable Photoshop option.

    * Both for bloated code, inconsistent shortcuts and features across apps, and their shitty subscription scheme.

    • Doombot1@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I am proficient in photoshop as well, albeit nonprofessional. That being said, GIMP on its own is realllly hard to use after coming from PS. But with photogimp it’s a ton easier. I wouldn’t say it’s quite as good, but it’s pretty close. I’d give that a shot, at the very least.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I’d actually never used Photoshop until yesterday (CS6 to be exact. Yarr! 🏴‍☠️ ), out of curiosity to see how it compared to this modded GIMP, so I don’t really have a good frame of reference on how they truly compare beyond what I messed around with briefly.

      On a side note, I’ve seen on youtube that it’s possible to get the latest version of Photoshop working in WINE on Linux Mint, which could be an option if you decide to fully switch to Linux. I managed to get CS6 working in WINE, though it seemed to be a little slowish when making brush strokes (unsure if that was normal or not), and there was a couple minor visual bugs (a tooltip not going away), but nothing that would’ve fully prevented me from using it.