Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.
What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.
You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.
I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.
You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.
How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D
More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.
It’s hilarious.
You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.
So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>
Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.
What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.
You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.
I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.
You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.
How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D
🥱
Edit because max comment depth reached:
Okay, the irony of this one actually made me snort audibly.
snort
Exactly as I called it.
More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.
It’s hilarious.
You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.
So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>